On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:11:28AM -0700, enh wrote:
>> is there a plan for improving testing? especially for multiple
>> architectures and multiple personalities?
>
> There was a promising idea by Mike Frysinger to reuse a framework:
> htt
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 09:11:28AM -0700, enh wrote:
> is there a plan for improving testing? especially for multiple
> architectures and multiple personalities?
There was a promising idea by Mike Frysinger to reuse a framework:
http://sourceforge.net/p/strace/mailman/strace-devel/thread/201305081
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:11 AM, enh wrote:
> is there a plan for improving testing? especially for multiple
> architectures and multiple personalities?
We are likely to have one GSOC student working on multiarchitecture
improvements, and tests are definitely part of it.
I would like to find a g
is there a plan for improving testing? especially for multiple
architectures and multiple personalities?
one thing i was thinking of was a single "syscall" binary that parses
its arguments and makes a syscall. so you can say something like:
syscall SYS_epoll_ctl -1 EPOLL_CTL_DEL -1 NULL
and ch
