I prefer (3) because it makes the loop behave in exactly the same way as it
would in any other language.
I don't like (2) at all because it removes information (the null values)
that is likely to have been included in the collection for a reason. Also,
if the iterate tag is ever extended to supp
Nick Pellow wrote:
>
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> >
> > Bugzilla bug report #706 reports that you will get a JSP page exception
> > when you try to iterate over collection that contains null values. This
> > is caused by the fact that the JSP page context refuses to allow null
> > attributes
>> Here are the alternatives that I can think of:
[skipped for brevity]
> (5) Add an attribute(s) on the iterate tag that allows the user to
>decide between (1), (2) and (3). Defaulting to (1).
I like that idea. Of course all possible behaviours should be selectable.
Also add
(6) Add an opti
husted 01/03/05 05:08:28
Added: src/doc installation-ipas.xml
Log:
Add instructions for iPortal Application Server, submitted by John Ueltzhoeffer.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-struts/src/doc/installation-ipas.xml
Index: installation-ipas.xm
husted 01/03/05 05:08:50
Modified:src/doc installation.xml
Log:
Add instructions for iPortal Application Server, submitted by John Ueltzhoeffer.
Revision ChangesPath
1.19 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/src/doc/installation.xml
Index: installation.xml
===
husted 01/03/05 05:09:20
Modified:.WhoWeAre
Log:
Update WhoWeAre bio.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +24 -22jakarta-struts/WhoWeAre
Index: WhoWeAre
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-strut
Since we have several new committers now, this would be a good time to
update our WhoWeAre file. We started out with some pretty long long bios
(see root directory in CVS). Personally, I'd like to do short
Jakarta-style
"WhoWeAre" page in the documentation, and then link to some longer
descripti
Create an Action to generate and output your page, and then return null
to the controller.
> Mallari Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> My web page is generated on the fly. The no of form elements are
> unknown. In this scenario, how can I use the struts framework?
>
> Please help me.
>
> Tha
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> src/ Java sources for components
> example/ Sources for example webapp
> share/Sources for struts.jar
> test/ Sources for test webapp
> unit/ Sources for unit tests
>
I very much agree with Ted on especially point #2.
Eirik
++
Eirik Lygre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e-vita as, Stortorvet 3, Oslo
Mobil: (+47) 905 66476
Fax: (+47) 23 35 70 51
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05.03.2001 15:02
Please respond to struts-dev
To: [EMAIL PR
Are the println() calls in a few of the taglib classes (e.g. Checkbox,
Html, Multibox, RadioTag) really necessary, or could these be print()s?
Or rather, would they be =better= as print()s?
Most of the time it doesn't matter, but with the checkbox tag, for
example, most browsers interpret the ins
Hi. I'm using Java 1.3, Weblogic 6.0, Struts 1.0 beta 1.
I'm using an extension of the STRUTS Action class to perform form-based
authentication.
After authenticating the user, I retrieve a return URL path from the session
and create an ActionForward
object with that return URL and return this ob
Title: ATTENTION! The Well-Paid Job in the Internet!
We wish You a pleasant and successful day!In Russian Make money without leaving Your computer!If You show some interest and patience and understand as IT works, You can earn up to $100,000 and more!!! During the following 120 days - it depends on
I never saw any comment on this in struts-user. Perhaps it is better for
struts-dev.
Mike
>Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 11:18:38 MST
>From: "Michael McCallister (r2126c)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: logic:present Property Oddity?
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Apparently-To:
I want to present a selection of Integers for the user
to choose. The jsp code is:
The form bean has an indexed property "years":
public Integer [] getYears();
The above jsp code fails with this message:
Root cause:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.l
(1) This would be fine with me. Given that there seem to be as many opinions
on this subject as people expressing them, perhaps this would be the
expedient choice for 1.0.
(2) I don't like this because of the disparity between the number of
iterations and the size of the collection. The tag beco
Title: RE: [VOTE] Proposed Committer: Cedric Dumoulin
Cedric,
Congratulations. I would +1 you, too, if I had a vote. This should be a very good thing for your Components project.
- Coty
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, Ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
