The tree is tagged for Beta 1

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Cooper
FYI, the CVS tree has been tagged for the Beta 1 release. It may be a day, or perhaps more, until I can push the official notice out, which is why I'm letting struts-dev know in advance. -- Martin Cooper -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/logic NestedIterateTag.java

2002-03-13 Thread arron
arron 02/03/13 05:13:28 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested NestedPropertyHelper.java NestedPropertyTag.java NestedRootTag.java src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-nested.xml

2002-03-13 Thread arron
arron 02/03/13 05:15:37 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-nested.xml Log: Docco on dynamic includes and the use of the root tag. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +16 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-nested.xml Index: struts-nested.xml

[Patch] DynaActionFormClass.

2002-03-13 Thread Porter, Roy
From introspect method in DynaActionFormClass if (DynaActionForm.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass)) { this should be if (!DynaActionForm.class.isAssignableFrom(beanClass)) { I raised this a couple of weeks ago (the whole line was the other way round then). I was ignored

FormTag problem with VisualAge

2002-03-13 Thread Porter, Roy
Whenever I get a new copy of the Struts Source, I have to go in and make the following change to the FormTag java code: From doEndTag: Remove: pageContext.removeAttribute(Constants.BEAN_KEY, PageContext.REQUEST_SCOPE);

Humorous error when running nightly build of struts-example

2002-03-13 Thread Matt Raible
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Class 'org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm' is not a subclas s of 'org.apache.struts.action.DynaActionForm' I couldn't resist sharing this. Matt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java

2002-03-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc02/03/13 10:10:40 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java Log: Correct the state of the instance of test -- Martin, you'll want to include this in the b1 tag. I botched it in fixing a bug report that had the previous test backwards anyway

Re: [Patch] DynaActionFormClass.

2002-03-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Yarg, I botched this when fixing a Bugzilla bug against the old assignable from test that didn't really allow subclassing. I just checked in this fix. Martin, you'll really want to update the beta1 tag to include it -- otherwise DynaActionForms (including the login page of the struts example)

Re: FormTag problem with VisualAge

2002-03-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Porter, Roy wrote: Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:24:07 - From: Porter, Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FormTag problem with VisualAge Whenever I get a new copy of the

Question about design migration to struts

2002-03-13 Thread Heath Chiavettone
Hello, I hope this is the correct forum for this. I wanted to get the opinion/knowledge of the struts contributors on this one. If it isn't go ahead and move it to the struts-users list. I am investigating porting an existing Model 1+ JSP implementation to Struts and Model 2. I call it

request time attribute value for name attribute in tiles put tag

2002-03-13 Thread Chris Cool
Is there any reason why the name attribute of tiles put tag _cannot_ be evaluated at runtime? Currently, rtexprvalue=false for the name attribute. I changed it in my sandbox and it appeared to work properly. Thanks, Chris -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7097] New: - when bean has null value for PresentTag exception is saved, even though value is cleared

2002-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7097. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7097] - when bean has null value for PresentTag exception is saved, even though value is cleared

2002-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7097. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: FormTag problem with VisualAge

2002-03-13 Thread Colin Sharples
To be fair, the JSP code that WebSphere is using for this originally came from a bug in Tomcat 3.0, which incorrectly disallowed removing attributes from request scope. That was more than a couple of years ago, though; it's really time for IBM to have fixed this by now. It *is* fixed.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7103] New: - digester parsing error in struts-config.xml contained in struts-tiles

2002-03-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7103. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tiles/web/doc/WEB-INF struts-config.xml

2002-03-13 Thread martinc
martinc 02/03/13 21:17:41 Modified:contrib/tiles/web/doc/WEB-INF struts-config.xml Log: Fix the name of the message resources element. PR: 7103 Submitted by: Steve Wilkinson Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +3 -3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7103] - digester parsing error in struts-config.xml contained in struts-tiles

2002-03-13 Thread bugzilla
|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-03-14 05:18 --- Fixed in 20020313 nightly build. Will be fixed in Struts 1.1 Beta 1. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionFormClass.java

2002-03-13 Thread Martin Cooper
OK, I've picked up this change for Beta 1. I've also picked up your later commit, fixing a config file problem, and one of my own, fixing a similar problem. It's not a good sign to release a beta in which we don't have our own example config files right. ;-) -- Martin Cooper - Original

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml

2002-03-13 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc02/03/13 22:15:55 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java src/share/org/apache/struts/util GenericDataSource.java web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml Removed: src/share/org/apache/struts/util GenericConnection.java