Re: Caching tiles

2002-03-21 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
Hello, I haven't hear of such functionality yet. You're welcome to contribute and provide code and examples for it . Cedric Pieter Coucke wrote: Hi, In order to improve the performance of our project, I'd like to use a form of caching. I was thinking of something in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7317] New: - RequestUtils.populate() convert null or empty parameter to 0 integer

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7317. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions SwitchAction.java LocalStrings.properties

2002-03-21 Thread Martin Cooper
Actually, my correction isn't quite right either. I believe the attributes being set/removed here should not have the prefix at all, since this action is (or rather should be) effectively doing the same thing as the second half of RequestUtils.selectApplication(). In fact, given that, would it

[PATCH] make logic:empty/notEmpty also work with Collections

2002-03-21 Thread Erich Meier
Hi! The attached src/doc minipatch enables the logic:empty tag to also deal with collections. It is diffed against the current cvs. Thanks for considering it for intergration, Erich -- Dr. Erich Meier, Software Process Improvement method park, Wetterkreuz 19a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Tel.

[GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

2002-03-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
This email is autogenerated from the output from: http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-03-21/jakarta-struts.html Buildfile: build.xml init: [echo] - jakarta-struts 1.1-b1

Bus error starting app with DataSource with Struts 1.1

2002-03-21 Thread Peter Hunter
Hi An application that worked just fine in 1.0 I have tried to get running under 1.1 without success. My Tomcat server dies with a bus error during the initialization of the ActionServlet. If I run the server with -verbose, the last line before it dies is: [Loaded

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7329] New: - [PATCH] Nested tags for logic:iterate

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7329] - [PATCH] Nested tags for logic:iterate

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

2002-03-21 Thread Couball, James
I think the gump build failed because the jakarta-struts.xml project file does not list jakarta-regexp as a dependency. This dependency was introduced with the Validator integration. I think this could be solved with the following line added after the /ant line: depend project=jakarta-regexp

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

2002-03-21 Thread David Winterfeldt
On this same note, I forgot to copy the Jakarta Regexp jar to the dist/lib directory and into the validator example webapp. I'll file bugs for things like this and fix them. David --- Couball, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the gump build failed because the jakarta-struts.xml project

newbie to struts

2002-03-21 Thread Jose Casas
Hi, I hope this is the right forum for this. Does anybody know of a good tutorial for doing validation with struts? Or does anybody have a good example of how validation should be done? Please help. Thankyou. ** This

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

2002-03-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Couball, James wrote: Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:16:10 -0800 From: Couball, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts I think the gump build

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util GenericDataSource.java

2002-03-21 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc02/03/21 15:22:45 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH GenericDataSource.java Log: Synchronize execution of open() to avoid problems if two or more threads call getConnection() on a new GenericDataSource instance at the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5008] - GenericeDataSource.getConnection not thread safe

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5008. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Struts

2002-03-21 Thread Couball, James
If you want to be compatible with pre-jdk1.4 versions it is best to stick with the apache.org stuff. I assume that this will be the case for the near to med term. Sincerely, James. -Original Message- From: Struts-dev Newsgroup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5263] - Can't build Struts WorkFlow component

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5263. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7343] New: - titlekey bug found in bug 6067 appears to be in nested tags also

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7343. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7343] - titlekey bug found in bug 6067 appears to be in nested tags also

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7343. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6067] - FormTag properties do not match TLD file.

2002-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6067. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7354] - Email Validation doesn't allow '-' in address

2002-03-21 Thread David Winterfeldt
Email Validation doesn't allow '-' in address. This is an error in the Jakarta Regexp package. It also has trouble with large max values. ex: ^\d{2,1000}$ Does anyone think we should just switch to ORO? I'm leaning that way, but I used Jakarta Regexp because it was considered 'lighter'.