Hi
the ForwardAction seems not to be compliant with sub-applications ...
The path of the jsp passed as parameter to ForwardAction (in
struts-config.xml) has to be context-relative, instead of module
relative ...
is that a bug or a desired feature ? :)
Hi
the ForwardAction seems not to be compliant with sub-applications ...
The path of the jsp passed as parameter to ForwardAction (in=20
struts-config.xml) has to be context-relative, instead of module=20
relative ...
is that a bug or a desired feature ? :)
here is a patch that could solve this problem.
execute() method of org.apache.struts.actions.ForwardAction
if you have any comment about it ...
---
public ActionForward execute(ActionMapping mapping,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13177.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Why does Opera ever see the DTD? ... odd ... I just open my DTDs up in
Netbeans personally. I can't imagine the DTD being seen during app
execution - I'm guessing you are opening it for reference.
One observation I would make: Shouldn't we be using an encoding of
UTF-8? I thought that
Of course the app never shows the dtd :-). I went to the dtd url referenced
by struts-config.xml and got xml parsing errors because of that first
processing instruction. Not that I care if Opera chokes on it, but it did
alert me to the fact that it probably shouldn't be in there.
Dave
I'm about as stupid as it gets wrt XML/DTDs. I can use digester to
instantiate/configure stuff (piece of cake!) but I haven't cured my
definite lack of knowledge on XML yet ... :-/ I really should too - I
see a lot of utility in it.
Sorry for asking a stupid question - I just couldn't see
David Graham wrote:
The struts-config_1_1.dtd file starts with this line:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
which I think is incorrect. DTDs aren't xml documents so
they shouldn't start with that processing instruction.
I'm not an XML expert but Sun's DTDs don't have this line
Must I explicitly ask for that section to be added to my CVS checkout?
When I run cvs update I don't get it added to my checkout - am I
wrong to expect that to add it? I'm a bit of a CVS novice myself :-) I
know for a fact there are people wanting at this though - and it's
easier to point
Did you use -d?
James Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the Open Minded Developer Network
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:30 PM
To: Struts
Thanks for the link. I've never used xml schema and most xml I've seen is
validated against a dtd but it's nice that it's there.
Should I post this to bugzilla or does one of the committers want to quickly
remove that line from the dtd?
Dave
From: James Childers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Use the following command to pick up everything new that's checked in (as
well as pruning empty directories):
cvs update -dP
Craig
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Eddie Bush wrote:
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 12:29:54 -0500
From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:36 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts-EL: Finished with copyright header and javadoc
Use the following command to pick up everything new that's
checked in
Thanks for the tips :-)
Karr, David wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Use the following command to pick up everything new that's
checked in (as
well as pruning empty directories):
cvs update -dP
Or even better, create a file
Karr, David wrote:
Or even better, create a file $HOME/.cvsrc that sets your always
options, that might look like this (make sure you understand all of these
options before you store this):
--
cvs -r
update -dP
checkout -P
diff -c
--
Shouldn't that be diff -u?
--
Well, that was a very smart suggestion !
So, what about creating this interface ?
- this interface could be called org.apache.struts.util.IAppException
- this interface would declare 2 methods: getError() and getProperty().
- this interface would be used by the default exception handler to
I don't think adding interfaces using hungarian notation (I prefix) is a
very good idea. It decreases readability and makes the name nonsensical.
It's especially not a good idea when none of the other interfaces used in
struts have that notation.
Dave
From: phpsurf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will need to get used to schemas tho'. If you have a look at the draft
2.4 servlet spec, they now use a schema instead of a dtd for web.xml.
It's a pity that digester doesn't yet work with registering schema's
(only DTD's) - although you can set a schema.
James Childers wrote:
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts-EL: Finished with copyright header and javadoc
I've finished adding the copyright header to all the java
source files, and
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts-EL: Finished with copyright header and javadoc
Karr, David wrote:
Or even better, create a file $HOME/.cvsrc that sets your
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I think some enhancements to the MessagesTag are appropriate but before I
started coding a patch I thought I would get some developer opinions. I
think it should support message resources keys in the same way that the
ErrorsTag does. Instead of errors.* it would support
messages.header
craigmcc == craigmcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
craigmcc craigmcc2002/10/01 18:50:13
craigmcc Modified:.build.xml
craigmcccontrib/struts-el build.xml
craigmcc Log:
craigmcc Update the main build.xml file to include struts-el in the new
craigmcc2002/10/01 20:51:56
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
Log:
Remove the ?xml? prolog from the DTD for the Struts configuration file.
DTDs are not supposed to have one, and some XML processors will complain if
it is present.
PR: 13187
Submitted by: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc == craigmcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
craigmcc craigmcc2002/10/01 18:50:13
craigmcc Modified:.build.xml
craigmcccontrib/struts-el build.xml
craigmcc Log:
craigmcc Update the main build.xml file to include struts-el in the new
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13189.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 1 Oct 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 01 Oct 2002 21:14:26 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el build.xml
craigmcc == craigmcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig On 1 Oct 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 01 Oct 2002 21:14:26 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig On 1 Oct 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 01 Oct 2002 21:14:26 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
30 matches
Mail list logo
