Hi guys,
I have a question regarding the order of using Commons-Validator in Struts
1.1. Actually Struts feed the FORM before doing validation on this one.
Because the FORM must not throw exception during this feeding, usually your
FORMBEAN use only String datatype as setter/getter.
But
Hi,
Actually the /do/* path mapped pattern doesn't work fine with modules, does this
pattern will work
with final release
...And, is it a good advice to use /do/* instead of *.do
Thanx,
-emmanuel
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14506.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
As you are aware, there is a lot of good, general purpose, code in struts.
I have been taking code and modifying it for my own uses. I thought this
would be worth a 1 minute discussion so I understand the issues. My main
issue is with clause 2. BTW clause three has a spelling error
Eric Beaumier wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a question regarding the order of using Commons-Validator in
Struts 1.1. Actually Struts feed the FORM before doing validation on
this one. Because the FORM must not throw exception during this
feeding, usually your FORMBEAN use only String datatype as
I think you could just copy the license into a file and distribute it with
your software. Or, if you have an about page you could display it there.
David
From: Edgar Dollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Graham wrote:
After you form passes validation you can validate the business rules
by copying the form data into your VO and calling some business
method. The form validation is only meant to check things like, Is
this a credit card number format? or Is this a valid email
format?.
I wasn't chewing you out, just clarifying :-).
David
From: Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RequestProcessor and processValidate
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:13:46 -0600
David Graham
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14683.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11932.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14684.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edgar Dollin wrote:
As you are aware, there is a lot of good, general purpose, code in struts.
I have been taking code and modifying it for my own uses. I thought this
would be worth a 1 minute discussion so I understand the issues. My main
issue is with clause 2.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14506.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14684.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14683.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14693.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
In 1.0, the way we do that is to use an Action that returned an
ActionForward with redirect=true. In 1.1, we can elevate that
approach to a standard RedirectAction -- at least, once I fix the
bug in * that prepends a slash to everything whether redirect is
set to true or not =:0)
I took a
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Emmanuel Boudrant wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:48:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Does the /do/* will be supported with modules
Hi,
Actually the /do/*
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, David Graham wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:58:00 -0700
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Source Code
I think you could just copy the license into a file and distribute it with
Please join me in congratulating Ted -- at the Apache Software Foundation
Member's Meeting (held last night at ApacheCon), Ted was approved for
membership in the ASF. Way to go Ted!
Craig
(PS: Struts In Action is for sale at the bookstore, and I've
autographed several copies already :-)
--
Thanx Craig ... and CONGRATULATION Ted for joining the ASF.
Thanx for your support.
-emmanuel
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Emmanuel Boudrant wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:48:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL
WT - Go Husted! Congratulations! Well-deserved :-)
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Please join me in congratulating Ted -- at the Apache Software Foundation
Member's Meeting (held last night at ApacheCon), Ted was approved for
membership in the ASF. Way to go Ted!
Craig
(PS: Struts In
Yes, good show, Ted. Well deserved. Great to see the deserving get the
deserts.
At 03:43 PM 11/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Please join me in congratulating Ted -- at the Apache Software Foundation
Member's Meeting (held last night at ApacheCon), Ted was approved for
membership in the ASF. Way
Sincere congratulations for joining this quite exclusive an
organization.
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ted Husted, Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Please
dgraham 2002/11/19 20:27:59
Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml
Log:
Updated html tag docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +3 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml
Index: struts-html.xml
dgraham 2002/11/19 20:29:27
Modified:doc/userGuide struts-tiles.xml struts-html.xml
struts-nested.xml struts-bean.xml struts-logic.xml
struts-template.xml
Log:
Removed version number from all taglib URIs.
Revision ChangesPath
dgraham 2002/11/19 21:00:19
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html HtmlTag.java
Log:
Fixed situation where xhtml wouldn't render without locale=true. This
required a change in a protected support method so I deprecated the
existing one and created a modified new
dgraham 2002/11/19 21:36:50
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html FormTag.java
Log:
Don't display browser hiding trick for javascript when form is xhtml. XML
user agents are allowed to ignore theses comments and the W3C recommends
not using this trick.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi All,
How do we handle session management using Struts ? Being ,new to struts, I have little
idea about this.
Thanks,
- raj
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
31 matches
Mail list logo