Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

> "dgraham" == dgraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: dgraham> dgraham 2002/12/23 17:45:15 dgraham> Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml dgraham> Log: dgraham> Updated info on tags. dgraham> Revision ChangesPath dgraham> 1.42 +6 -2 ja

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

> "Martin" == Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> A number of new features have been added to Struts since the 1.1 Beta 2 Martin> release, and many bugs have been fixed. Therefore, I propose that we Martin> release the tip of the main trunk in CVS as Beta 3 for a Stru

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12871] - ExceptionHandler does not obey controller inputForward rule

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ExceptionHandler.java

ekbush 2002/12/23 21:30:07 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ExceptionHandler.java Log: The forward returned from execute should be contextRelative no matter which way it is obtained. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +2 -1 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15604] - Struts framework should use getInstance Method for instantiating FormBeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised) (fwd)

Here's Rob's vote: -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:06:58 -0800 From: Rob Leland Speaks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised) I DOn't have access to my normal e-mail account so can't

RE: Tying Up Loose Ends

BTW, if the other piece of size= (setting the values to new instances of the base class) is implemented, then I withdraw this, because then you wouldn't need to use a converter to create arrays of mutable objects, you could do it with size=. Then the initial= argument could be used only for things

RE: Tying Up Loose Ends

> * The application has registered a custom Converter that creates > an array of objects of the appropriate type from the String-valued > "initial" attribute. > > * The application then modifies the values on a per-user or > per-request > basis (rather than using this technique to initiali

Overloaded Setters in Form

Seasons greetings friends! I sent an email inquiring about overloaded setters in Forms to the struts-user mailing list. I was told that I needed a BeanInfo. I gave the BeanInfo a try and it did not work. So, I started reading code and decided that an overloaded example in TestBean was needed.

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:59:50 -0800 (PST) > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tying Up Loose Ends > > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2002

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14800] - Fix initialization bug and add size parameter to form-property

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[PROPOSED] html:link should have an "action=" option

I find I write a lot of code that uses an intermediate action to link between two web pages (this is good Struts policy in general) However, since the html:link tag has a forward= but no action=, I have to use page= and supply a URI with the ".do" extension at the end, rather than being about to u

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources powered.xml

No, I've searched most of the "English version" of their site and it appears to be all static or perl. Unless anyone objects, I'm going to remove the listing. -- James Mitchell Software Engineer/Open Source Evangelist http://www.open-tools.org "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 18:01:34 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.44 +17 -17jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml Index: struts-html.xml ==

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

Martin Cooper wrote: -- Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable tohelp support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the relea

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide building_model.xml building_view.xml configuration.xml dev_tiles.xml dev_validator.xml index.xml installation-ipas.xml installation-jr30.xml installation-ubs72.xml installation-was352.xml installation.xml introduction.xml preface.xml release-notes-1.0-b1.xml release-notes-1.0-b2.xml release-notes-1.0-b3.xml release-notes-1.0.1.xml release-notes-1.0.xml release-notes-1.1-b1.xml release-notes-1.1-b2.xml release-notes.xml struts-logic.xml struts-nested.xml struts-tiles.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:50:09 Modified:doc/userGuide building_model.xml building_view.xml configuration.xml dev_tiles.xml dev_validator.xml index.xml installation-ipas.xml installation-jr30.xml installation-ubs72.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

dgraham 2002/12/23 17:47:45 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Log: Updated info on xhtml tag. Revision ChangesPath 1.43 +3 -4 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml Index: struts-html.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide struts-html.xml

dgraham 2002/12/23 17:45:15 Modified:doc/userGuide struts-html.xml Log: Updated info on tags. Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +6 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/struts-html.xml Index: struts-html.xml =

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:36:47 -0800 (PST) A number of new features have been added to Struts since the 1.1 Beta 2 relea

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources powered.xml

Has anyone ever seen the Povoglie link actually work? It's been in here for a long time now, but every time I try to chase the link, it fails. It seems to me that we should probably just remove it, rather than preserving a broken link. -- Martin Cooper On 24 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources projects.xml tutorials.xml views.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:20:58 Modified:doc/resources projects.xml tutorials.xml views.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/projects.xml Index: projects.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources powered.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:19:47 Modified:doc/resources powered.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/powered.xml Index: powered.xml === RCS file

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals workflow.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:15:08 Modified:doc/proposals workflow.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +7 -7 jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/workflow.xml Index: workflow.xml === RCS f

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals struts-faces.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:12:05 Modified:doc/proposals struts-faces.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/struts-faces.xml Index: struts-faces.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/news index.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 17:05:54 Modified:doc/news index.xml Log: DOH! Sorry James and Kevin!! forgot to update my copy first! Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +29 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/news/index.xml Index: index.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/news index.xml news_2001.xml news_2002_q2.xml news_2002_q3.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 16:57:57 Modified:doc/news index.xml news_2001.xml news_2002_q2.xml news_2002_q3.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +4 -33 jakarta-struts/doc/news/index.xml Index: index.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/faqs eclipse.xml kickstart.xml netbeans.xml newbie.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 16:56:08 Modified:doc/faqs eclipse.xml kickstart.xml netbeans.xml newbie.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -4 jakarta-struts/doc/faqs/eclipse.xml Index: eclipse.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide building_apps.xml

jmitchell2002/12/23 16:51:10 Modified:doc/userGuide building_apps.xml Log: Fix a few typos Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/building_apps.xml Index: building_apps.xml

RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

-- Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable tohelp support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release [ ] -1 I am against

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Given a little time to work on Struts (finally), I'd like to tackle the > top two bugs (based on severity) in our remaining list: > > * 14669 -- reset() in DynaActionForm acts the same as in ActionForm > > * 14800 -- Fix initialization bug and si

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > -- > Vote: Struts 1.1b3 Release Plan > [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it > [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable tohelp support it > [ ]

[VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

A number of new features have been added to Struts since the 1.1 Beta 2 release, and many bugs have been fixed. Therefore, I propose that we release the tip of the main trunk in CVS as Beta 3 for a Struts 1.1 release. I have checked in a proposed release plan, revised from the previous version, whi

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:13:24 + > From: Peter A. Pilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tying Up Loose Ends > > Craig R. McClanahan wro

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml

martinc 2002/12/23 14:26:34 Modified:doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml Log: Update proposed freeze / tag date and open bug list. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +11 -24jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/release-plan-1.1b3.xml Index: release-plan-1.1b3.xml =

Re: Tying Up Loose Ends

Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Given a little time to work on Struts (finally), I'd like to tackle the top two bugs (based on severity) in our remaining list: * 14669 -- reset() in DynaActionForm acts the same as in ActionForm * 14800 -- Fix initialization bug and size parameter to form-property Wh

Re: Struts Tools

I came upon this message while looking for Eclipse IDE information. To make Struts easier to use in Eclipse, I import the jar version followed by the java source and re-export them into a bin/source jar. This corrects line feed issues and makes it easy to step from my code to struts code in the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14800] - Fix initialization bug and add size parameter to form-property

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/util TestRequestUtils.java

craigmcc2002/12/23 14:00:25 Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd src/share/org/apache/struts/config FormPropertyConfig.java src/test/org/apache/struts/action TestDynaActionForm.java src/test/org/apache/struts/mock TestMockBase.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14669] - reset() in DynaActionForm act the same as ActionForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java

craigmcc2002/12/23 12:52:38 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action DynaActionForm.java src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java Log: WARNING: Backwards-incompatible patch being applied. Please review! Commit a fix for 14669 ("reset() in DynaAction

Tying Up Loose Ends

Given a little time to work on Struts (finally), I'd like to tackle the top two bugs (based on severity) in our remaining list: * 14669 -- reset() in DynaActionForm acts the same as in ActionForm * 14800 -- Fix initialization bug and size parameter to form-property What I propose to do for 14669

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15604] - Struts framework should use getInstance Method for instantiating FormBeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15604] - Struts framework should use getInstance Method for instantiating FormBeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15604] - Struts framework should use getInstance Method for instantiating FormBeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15604] - Struts framework should use getInstance Method for instantiating FormBeans

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Avoid code reformating !

If you're spending 10 minutes on code formatting you're using the wrong tool. Just get a code formatter and change it to how you like. If you're sending in code, just change it back to the standard before sending. David From: "Andrew Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]