DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16530] New: - gets funky value running in mod_jk

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Cracking the whip

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote: > > Dear Mr. Validator, > > > > Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and > > #16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration. > > Any progress to report? > > > > ;-) > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > Whoops, they weren't showing up

RE: Cracking the whip

> Dear Mr. Validator, > > Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and > #16337 may be a problem with Struts/Validator integration. > Any progress to report? > > ;-) > > -- > Martin Cooper Whoops, they weren't showing up on my bug query, I'll jump right on 'em. Boy, I get called M

Struts joins the "zero bad imports" list

Struts has now joined the (rather small) list of Jakarta projects which have *zero* bad imports (i.e. unused or unnecessary) in their code base: http://cvs.apache.org/~tcopeland/jakarta_bad_imports.htm Cool! -- Martin Cooper -

Re: Cracking the whip

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote: > Hey folks, if we're going to go for the Valentine's Day Release > Massacre, we need to get the last 5 bugs closed. Any progress to report > by anyone? Dear Mr. Validator, Bugzilla #16272 looks like a Commons Validator bug, and #16337 may be a problem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16517] - Example comment for form-bean in struts-config.xml in struts-blank application missing closing tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml

rleland 2003/01/28 21:35:25 Modified:web/example/WEB-INF struts-config.xml Log: Bug 16517 Reported by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually it isn't clear but the commented out XML wasn't supposed to be closed by a it was ment to be an optional part of the starting tag, but I agree it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16517] New: - Example comment for form-bean in struts-config.xml in struts-blank application missing closing tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16514] New: - Nested tiles fail in this release

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16337] - Using the validator and DynaValidatorForm does not work with multi page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/config ControllerConfig.java

craigmcc2003/01/28 11:30:24 Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd doc/userGuide configuration.xml src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java RequestProcessor.java src/share/org/apache/struts/config Contro

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS]Generating XML from Struts JSP

The JavaWorld article is indeed pretty good, except for the predating of the XHMTL tag in the struts-html tag library. Also it seems to me that the meat of the servlet they use in their example code could be encapsulated in a single custom tag that inserted the xml in the output. So if you take t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Action question

> -Original Message- > From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > A Thank you. I am such a moron. No, you're not; it's not a very well-named element and causes lots of people lots of problems. The good (or bad!) news is you'll probably now edit your struts-config.xml

RE: Action question

A Thank you. I am such a moron. I see the tie now. I just looked at the DTD again right as your mail cam in. I see where you can specify and ActionMapping subclass on the action element that would have to have these properties. Thank you all very much for your patience. ---

RE: Action question

> -Original Message- > From: Travis Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the > code and I see where almost everything is being done. The > only thing I still am having trouble with is if the Digester > loads the ActionMapping objects

RE: Action question

Ok last question I promise. I have been going through the code and I see where almost everything is being done. The only thing I still am having trouble with is if the Digester loads the ActionMapping objects and the RequestProcessor loads the Action objects, how does the Action object get at

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS]Generating XML from Struts JSP

Object Oriented Programmer Syndrome, aka OOPS. I forgot to say this is up on the web and you can play (not abuse please, it is my pipe/bandwidth) at: http://soap2k.appsaspeers.com:8080/struts-example/ Logon and enter your registration info and then go back to Edit Registration and change the URL

RE: Synchronized blocks?

>>,although Java makes threading relatively easy... I find Java gives you more than enough thread to hang yourself with ;-> -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2003 23:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Synchronized blocks? Tha

Re: Synchronized blocks?

Thanks for the explanation Craig. That's what I meant when I said that unsynchronized methods can be called regardless of synchronized method calls. And of course you can't fully tell if a class is thread safe by the existence of synch. methods. I was concerned when I saw unsynch. access to

RE: Synchronized blocks?

I've read his book - good one. Mark -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of V. Cekvenich Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 8:21 AM Best site on collections and threads: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/ by Doug Lea .V -- To unsubscribe, e

backups to default message ressource with error

I used with my browser locale de_AT sent, and dvelving into struts source-code inside ...struts.util.PropertyMessageResource I found that it does´nt strip of the locales correctly -> my key="labels.xxx.xxx", enhanced firstly with "de_AT.labels.xxx.xxx", transformed incorrcetly to ".labels.xxx.xxx"

Re: Synchronized blocks?

Best site on collections and threads: http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/classes/collections/ by Doug Lea .V David Graham wrote: Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized block grabs the object's monitor and blocks other threads from calling *synchronized* methods on that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16491] - Transform minlength validator to "minlengthorempty"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16491] New: - Transform minlength validator to "minlengthorempty"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16489] New: - minlength and maxlength js validator with password fields

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu