DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16603.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
These methods are used by the Tiles subclasses, which are part of
Struts ;-) The doc says that methods are not part of the API to prevent
regular users to use them. Normally, users only need to overload
doInclude() or doForward().
Cedric
David Graham wrote:
The
rleland 2003/02/08 11:31:52
Modified:.build-all-clean.bat.sample
Log:
Update to build current version of struts
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +5 -2 jakarta-struts/build-all-clean.bat.sample
Index: build-all-clean.bat.sample
cedric 2003/02/08 11:34:19
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/xmlDefinition
XmlParser.java
Log:
Let the bean rules use the correct declaration.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +4 -4
You are right, this is probably a cutpaste error. I have corrected it.
Cedric
Martin Cooper wrote:
Running PMD over the latest code, I think I've found a bug in the Tiles
XmlParser class. Lines 255 - 256 of this class look like this:
String menuItemDefaultClass =
Hi,
But where do you declare objects in the config file ? If we enable
someting like beanName=someBean in the config file, where does the
bean should come from ?
Cedric
Frank Kim wrote:
I have a quick question regarding the difference in terms of functionality between put tag and
rleland 2003/02/08 12:01:46
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/xmlDefinition
XmlParser.java
Log:
deprecated setDetail level.
Use the commons-logging to set digester debug level.
I am assuming that since this source code is in the
Struts 1.1
rleland 2003/02/08 12:10:02
Modified:.build.properties.sample
Log:
Tiles requres JUnit 3.81 or newer for unit tests.
Revision ChangesPath
1.29 +3 -3 jakarta-struts/build.properties.sample
Index: build.properties.sample
craigmcc2003/02/08 13:01:52
Modified:src/test/org/apache/struts/mock TestMockBase.java
src/test/org/apache/struts/util TestRequestUtils.java
Log:
As part of the investigation of Bugzilla ticket #16603, create unit tests
that validate the current behavior of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16514.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
craigmcc2003/02/08 13:20:20
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
Log:
Formally document the behavior of forwardURL() so that people will know
what to expect (and what we test for). No functionality changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.83 +38 -8
craigmcc2003/02/08 14:12:09
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
src/test/org/apache/struts/util TestRequestUtils.java
Log:
Unit tests for the current behavior of RequestUtils.pageURL(). We deliberately
do *not* do slash prepending here --
OK, I've assigned myself the following bugzilla ticket:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16603
and am trying to decide how to deal with it. I think I understand what
the reporter (cc'd above) is proposing. What's not clear is whether we
should make any change now, or perhaps
craigmcc2003/02/08 15:31:30
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
src/share/org/apache/struts/action ExceptionHandler.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/config ExceptionConfig.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
Log:
craigmcc2003/02/08 15:34:38
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util RequestUtils.java
Log:
Forgot a closing /p.
Revision ChangesPath
1.86 +5 -5
jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/RequestUtils.java
Index: RequestUtils.java
craigmcc2003/02/08 15:41:59
Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_1.dtd
Log:
Oops ... make the description of how the forward and include attributes
match what the current behavior actually is, rather than what they might
get changed to.
Revision ChangesPath
1.38
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:23:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugzilla #16603] Discussion Please
OK, I've
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I wanted to give a little status on this and query the committers on how they
would like me to proceed.
I've finished the changes for this, but I haven't checked anything in, as the
consensus was that we wanted to delay a fix for this until after 1.1. The
change simply required making sure every
My understanding of modules is that they're independent pieces that can plug
into any Struts app. They can point to external resources if they want but
don't need to. Based on that, I believe all resources for a module should
live in the same module root directory. You shouldn't have some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16899.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
However, at this point in time, I'm going to suggest that we resolve this
one as LATER and put it into the 1.2 Family camp.
+1, We have a good product and have uncovered some inconsistent behaviour.
The 1.2 relase time seems appropiate.
-Rob
26 matches
Mail list logo
