Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

James Mitchell wrote: On Wednesday 18 June 2003 23:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rleland 2003/06/18 20:30:46 Modified:.build.xml Log: Roll back changes so that inorder to build struts, a user must first go to the contrib.struts-legacy directory and do a seperate build. This

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

On Wednesday 18 June 2003 23:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rleland 2003/06/18 20:30:46 > > Modified:.build.xml > Log: > Roll back changes so that inorder to build struts, > a user must first go to the contrib.struts-legacy > directory and do a seperate build. This was don

cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

rleland 2003/06/18 20:30:46 Modified:.build.xml Log: Roll back changes so that inorder to build struts, a user must first go to the contrib.struts-legacy directory and do a seperate build. This was done because when a recursive build was performed the target was set to

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

me/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/collections/dist/commons-collections.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/digester/dist/commons-digester.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/fileupload/target/commons-fileupload-20030618.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-20030618.jar:/ho

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java

dgraham 2003/06/18 17:11:55 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ActionServlet.java Log: Deprecated debug variable and log() method because we're using commons-logging. Revision ChangesPath 1.149 +6 -4 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/Act

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20891] New: - Struts - Faces - Tiles FacesRequestProcessor issue + Fix

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20890] New: - Struts - Faces - Tiles - integration bug and fix

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20884] - floatRange does not check decimals (Struts 1.1RC2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17281] - Add validateLongRange to Validator

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20883] - longRange and doubleRange are required (Struts 1.1RC2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20888] - Problem while setting values in a list of objects in an ActionForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20889] - Problem while setting values in a list of objects in an ActionForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20889] New: - Problem while setting values in a list of objects in an ActionForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20888] New: - Problem while setting values in a list of objects in an ActionForm

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17613] - Problem with html:messages Tag and Tomcat Tag Pooling

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19911] - messages footer attribute written even when no messages when using tiles

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ActionServlet.log

Per the JavaDoc, the log level is now to be controlled by the underlying logging implementation rather than using the debug init-parameter. It seems logical that the log(String, int) method of ActionServlet should also be marked as deprecated. Is there a reason this hasn't been done yet? I see

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11520] - [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work with radio objects

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

ActionServlet.log

Per the JavaDoc, the log level is now to be controlled by the underlying logging implementation rather than using the debug init-parameter. It seems logical that the log(String, int) method of ActionServlet should also be marked as deprecated. Is there a reason this hasn't been done yet?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11520] - [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work with radio objects

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20884] New: - floatRange does not check decimals (Struts 1.1RC2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11520] - [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work with radio objects

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20883] New: - longRange and doubleRange are required (Struts 1.1RC2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Problem with the html:rewrite tag

That's sort of what I thought. If you have any suggestions as to how you would change this then I would be more than happy to implement then and post the patch file up to this group. Well, the first thing that needs to go is the checking for href, page, forward, and action. These should have thei

RE: Problem with the html:rewrite tag

That's sort of what I thought. If you have any suggestions as to how you would change this then I would be more than happy to implement then and post the patch file up to this group. Regards David Wilkinson -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20877] New: - MessagesTag has incorrect assignment in release()

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Problem with the html:rewrite tag

But looking into what is happening in the code still does not make sense to me, why is the redirect parameter being used for this encoding. According to the following code taken from the computeURL method in RequestUtils // Perform URL rewriting to include our session ID (if any) if

RE: Problem with the html:rewrite tag

Ok I under stand the need to not encode the & when using the in javascript as iam using the tag in javascript myself. But looking into what is happening in the code still does not make sense to me, why is the redirect parameter being used for this encoding. According to the following code taken f

Re: Question on struts, tiles and jsf

Hi, I know someone who have made some works, and apparently have succeed, to let Tiles, Struts and JSF work all together. Unfortunately, our mails are in French, and I have no more news since some weeks. Cedric Ives Landrieu wrote: Hi, I was experimenting with struts and tiles (not very

Re: Problem with the html:rewrite tag

The ampersand is only encoded in xhtml mode because people wanted to use in javascript which breaks with encoded ampersands. David Hi Since getting hold of struts 1.1 RC2 I have been getting a problem with the rewrite tag generating a url with the context root in twice. I have seen that this e

RE: [OT] IDEA was "Struts/.NET (was JavaPro)"

Yeh, If I was contracting I would probably do that too but on a salary its kind of hard to justify (well maybe not to myself but the wife wouldnt be too impressed) when its a huge percentage of your monthly paycheque and its not going to repay itself (at least not directly). Of course I could prob

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20864] New: - Wrong example in 5.3.3 Switching Modules

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [OT] IDEA was "Struts/.NET (was JavaPro)"

Andrew Hill wrote: > 300 Is it? > I thought it was $460++ USD for a single developer??? - way more than > my budget runs to :-( Compared to something like Visual Studio, it's still a bargain =:0) How times have changed! In decades past, I can remember paying like a thousand bucks for IDEs that

Problem with the html:rewrite tag

Hi Since getting hold of struts 1.1 RC2 I have been getting a problem with the rewrite tag generating a url with the context root in twice. I have seen that this error has been raised as an error under http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20835 upon looking at the code I have no

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

pload/target/commons-fileupload-20030618.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/lang/dist/commons-lang-20030618.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/va

RE: [OT] IDEA was "Struts/.NET (was JavaPro)"

300 Is it? I thought it was $460++ USD for a single developer??? - way more than my budget runs to :-( -Original Message- From: Jason L. Buberel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:05 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [OT] IDEA was "Struts/.NET (was JavaPro)"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20854] New: - RC2 error with nesting tags in separate pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu