Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > I actually think this is better, because you can customize *just* the B1 > path or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Paul Speed
Jing Zhou wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:58 PM > Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > > > > > > Jing Zhou wrote: > > > > > > - Original Messag

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Jing Zhou wrote: - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion Looks like you are asking less while I am asking more :-)

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > > Jing Zhou wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > > >Looks like you are asking less while I am asking more :-) > > > > > > Exactl

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Paul Speed
Jing Zhou wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:40 AM > Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > > > > (1) LookupCommand > > (2) ExceptionCatcher > > (3) Sel

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19780] - does not seem to support java.util.Set, contrary to documentation

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Paul Speed wrote: I haven't looked at the implementation yet (I intend to when I have more than 2 seconds free) but I have been lurking in this discussion. It seems to me that if a command could nest a chain then all things are possible. In fact, you wouldn't even need the "jump to last command

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:40 AM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > (1) LookupCommand > (2) ExceptionCatcher > (3) SelectLocale > (4) Process Action > (

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23633] - validateMinLength and validateMaxLength for password field

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23633] - validateMinLength and validateMaxLength for password field

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12473] - password fields are not validated using javscript (lengths)

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23633] - validateMinLength and validateMaxLength for password field

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23633] New: - validateMinLength and validateMaxLength for password field

2003-10-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Jing Zhou wrote: - Original Message - From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion Jing Zhou wrote: For me, "Simple thing should be simple" is the to

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Paul Speed wrote: I haven't looked at the implementation yet (I intend to when I have more than 2 seconds free) but I have been lurking in this discussion. It seems to me that if a command could nest a chain then all things are possible. In fact, you wouldn't even need the "jump to last command

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Paul Speed
Paul Speed wrote: > > I haven't looked at the implementation yet (I intend to when I have > more than 2 seconds free) but I have been lurking in this > discussion. > > It seems to me that if a command could nest a chain then all things > are possible. In fact, you wouldn't even need the "jump

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Paul Speed
I haven't looked at the implementation yet (I intend to when I have more than 2 seconds free) but I have been lurking in this discussion. It seems to me that if a command could nest a chain then all things are possible. In fact, you wouldn't even need the "jump to last command" logic since that

Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion

2003-10-06 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 1:02 PM Subject: Re: Struts-chain Behavior Discussion > > They could indeed be made part of the chain, and "checking the current > sta