Re: Bug 866 patches

At 11:10 AM -0800 2/2/04, Hubert Rabago wrote: Ted, Not sure if it mattered, but I used "diff -u -b" for the patches I submitted. I found out that my editor trimmed a lot of lines that only had spaces, and so the diffs I initially generated caught all of them. The ones I eventually submitted did

Bug 866 patches

Ted, Not sure if it mattered, but I used "diff -u -b" for the patches I submitted. I found out that my editor trimmed a lot of lines that only had spaces, and so the diffs I initially generated caught all of them. The ones I eventually submitted didn't have the whitespace changes. Also, the met

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17667] - Client-side validation with multi-form page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17667] - Client-side validation with multi-form page

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Uploading multiple patches (was [Bug 866])

Thanks for the info! Hopefully I'll get a chance to use this knowledge in the future. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > . > ANY REP

Re: multipart requests in struts-chain

At 11:33 PM -0800 2/1/04, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: The original design in struts-chain did not contemplate the complexities required to support file upload at all. If you can refactor the existing code to support that gracefully support both use cases, that's awesome ... if it requires separate

Re: 1.2.0

Last week was a wash, first a crisis, then I was traveling, and then it was SuperSunday. Hopefully, I can get back to the grind this week :) I'll be applying and testing the patch for the module parameter as well as "Clean way to add parameters", and I think that should be enough for 1.2.0 :) -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26592] New: - NullPointerException in RequestUtils in certain scenarios

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [chain] Chain as a mini-workflow engine?

Quoting Jeff Caddel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It's striking me that my chain-config.xml files are looking somewhat > similar to the example workflow xml file over in the sandbox/workflow area. > There are indeed some overlaps in concept ... after all, I didn't forget everything I learned from crea

Re: multipart requests in struts-chain

Quoting Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It seems that struts-chain's AbstractPopulateActionForm was > implemented with its own strategy for moving values from the context > to the form. Unfortunately, this strategy doesn't support multipart > forms (file uploads). > > I've hacked to make