Thanks for taking some time to answer my "naiive question.
>
> I think you've really got two threads of questions here, so
> let me try to
> address them separately.
>
> (1) Why use getXxx and setXxx for properties?
>
> This is a general design pattern called JavaBeans, and you
> will find it ver
Although you get basic type conversion with the getter/setter methods, it is
not a convincing argument. The price you pay for getting something that is
rather simple, is that 1) you have to always extend ActionForm 2) often use
reflection / PropertyUtils to get the information out.
Wouldn't it be
