Arron,
I just had the need to have a NestedCheckboxTag. Maybe you should
include it.
cheers,
tomK
nested-checkbox.zip
Description: nested-checkbox.zip
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the record:
I've been playing with Arron's nested tags for a while now, and they
seem OK to me. I've had the occasional what the #$%#@ when something
didn't work as I expected, but after thinking about it the reason was
obvious. This situation occurs with most struts tags (for me, in any
what you
mean by the
[something] either. Give the above a bash and hopefully it'll become
clear. Keeping in mind that if you do the above to a parent tag, all
it's children will nest on from the parent.
It's all in Package.html. :)
Arron
Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) wrote:
Hi Arron
Auch Arron,
Are you sure all those instanceof checks are a good idea? Adding
another nested tag would require you to adapt the NestedPropertyHelper,
which isn't clean design IMHO.
And I wouldn't have noticed this if I wasn't checking an NestedIterate
bug. nested:iterate behaves differently than
-Original Message-
From: Arron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 20 december 2001 15:25
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: nested : NestedPropertyHelper
[snip]
I also removed the check for the select tag. I had it there from when
there was no
I have submitted a patch once for solving this, but it seems to not have
made it in CVS.
Here's the patch again (against current CVS)
hth,
tomK
-Original Message-
From: Uladzimir Kavalchuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 13 december 2001 12:44
To: 'Struts Users Mailing
I'd prefer literal. freetext calls the notion of do what you want,
but it is of course do what html wants.
custom calls the notion of you have to program this yourself, which
isn't the case.
And verbatim is a close second, but not as English as literal imho.
Just my opinion
tomK
no such feature whatsoever.
For my defense, I can say that Sun should use the @since tag
more often
;)
tomK
-Original Message-
From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
Sent: vrijdag 16 november 2001 9:49
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Exception handling --- suggestion
Ok, sorry, I must have misread something...
tomK
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: maandag 12 november 2001 23:27
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items)
Arron wrote:
Thanks for the
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: zaterdag 10 november 2001 11:59
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items)
[...]
Again, in general, I would like to see the core Struts framework kept
I've sent this to struts-user, but nobody seems to know the answer.
Could the people that have defined this behaviour, shed some light on
this?
Thanks,
tomK
-Original Message-
From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
Sent: vrijdag 19 oktober 2001 17:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Form
11 matches
Mail list logo