Re: New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]

David Graham wrote: As one of those contributors to the whole "Composable Request Processor" a while ago, is there chance that we will get hint to what the Request Processor system look likes? I haven't seen it yet but I hear it's based on the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern and will be a com

Re: New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]

> As one of those contributors to the whole "Composable Request Processor" > a while ago, is there chance that we will get hint to what the > Request Processor system look likes? I haven't seen it yet but I hear it's based on the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern and will be a commons component,

New Request Processor System [was Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor]

David Graham wrote: There is some movement towards separating Struts from the Servlet API so that it may be used in by the upcoming Portlets API. Craig is implementing a new RequestProcessor system that accomodates that and I would hate to move things in the opposite direction by tying ActionForms

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

my request make any more sense or am I still missing > something. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 5:20 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or &g

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

Sounds like a good idea. Thanks -Original Message- From: Butler, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 6:25 PM To: 'Struts Developers List ' Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

truts Developers List Sent: 7/10/03 4:05 PM Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor I wasn't intending that the request object be kept around. Isn't it true that even if an ActionForm object is kept in the session scope, i

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

0 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479>. A

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21479] - Add ServletRequest or HttpServletRequest to ActionForm constructor

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu