Re: MessagesResources - some thoughts

2001-02-18 Thread Roland Huss
Hello, Craig Tataryn wrote: > But technically couldn't the application developer do this already? They > could just add another init-param to the Servlet which specified a > Resources class other than the default. The servlet writter would simply > use this resource bundle instead, getting

Re: MessagesResources - some thoughts

2001-02-16 Thread martin . cooper
Isn't this essentially why the "bundle" attribute was added to the tag? That would seem to solve the problem, although I guess it means you'd have to add that attribute to all your instances. -- Martin Cooper Tumbleweed Communications At 09:41 AM 2/16/01 -0600, Craig Tataryn wrote: >But tec

Re: MessagesResources - some thoughts

2001-02-16 Thread Craig Tataryn
But technically couldn't the application developer do this already? They could just add another init-param to the Servlet which specified a Resources class other than the default. The servlet writter would simply use this resource bundle instead, getting it's messages from there. You could have

Re: MessagesResources - some thoughts

2001-02-16 Thread Rob Leland
Roland Huss wrote: > > Hi, > > for some reasons I would like to separate messages put into JSP-pages > with from messages generated within java > code. +1 This sounds like a good Idea. I would vote for this change. Maybe you could post it to the bug/feature request so it ends up one the list

MessagesResources - some thoughts

2001-02-14 Thread Roland Huss
Hi, for some reasons I would like to separate messages put into JSP-pages with from messages generated within java code. I.e. packaging your application as jar file and still give designers a change to customize messages (without touching the jars) seems to be a good idea (at least for me ;-)