Rob,
It implements NestedNameSupport, which is an extension of
NestedPropertySupport. So in a way it does implement it. The statement
is therefore somewhat redundant in the other tags that implement
NestedNameSupport.
Currently, the tags that you can get the name reference from, you can
get t
In doing the UML for the nested Logic tags I noticed
that the NestedNotLogicEqual doesn't implement
NestedPropertySupport
public class NestedEqualTag extends EqualTag implements
NestedPropertySupport, NestedNameSupport {
public class NestedNotEqualTag extends NotEqualTag implements
NestedNameS
