DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26678] New: - tag must support formatting (format and formatKey attributes)

2004-02-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26133] New: - tag lacks "action" attribute

2004-01-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26127] New: - tag lacks "action" attribute

2004-01-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25588] New: - Tag don't recognize current Struts module for the attribute 'action'

2003-12-17 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] New: - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-23 Thread James Mitchell
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Robert Leland wrote: I'm about to roll off of one project and onto another so I should have some free time in between. I'll take care of this in a couple days...along with the long-promised (errr threatened) rewrite of the struts-example ;). > Ted Husted wrote: > > > If

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] New: - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread Robert Leland
Ted Husted wrote: If there are no objections on technical grounds, I would favor adding it. You can do this sort of thing with rewrite, but it's clumsy and counter-intuitive. +1,. It's a hole in the html tags, and a good fit. -Rob ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new tag for css stylesheet linking --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-22 22:29 --- How would this new tag relate to Struts? IMO, tags that don't talk to Struts belong in Jakarta Taglibs so non-Struts projects c

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] New: - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread Ted Husted
ASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new tag for css stylesheet linking --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-22 21:23 --- I wouldn't veto the addition of such a tag, because it is, in the words of the inimitable Douglas Adams, "mostly harmless". However, I agree

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new tag for css stylesheet linking --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-22 20:57 --- Because not only do I (and others I'm sure) strive for no scriplets in my code, I also strive for no embedded tags. Between Struts, Struts-el, and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new tag for css stylesheet linking --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-22 20:31 --- This seems silly (to me) to write a tag for this functionality. Why not just use or in the href attribute of t

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] New: - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-22 Thread James Mitchell
/nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 > > add new tag for css stylesheet linking > >Summary: add new tag f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24909] New: - add new tag for css stylesheet linking

2003-11-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24909 add new tag for css stylesheet linking Summary: add new tag for css stylesheet linking Product: Struts Version: Nightly Build Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24652] New: - tag does not translate into html code properly.

2003-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24651] New: - tag does not translate into html code properly.

2003-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20949] New: - Tag doesn't work well on RC2

2003-06-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20605] New: - tag throws exception when it has a body which may be empty

2003-06-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18539] New: - tag-doc contrib's taglibreports should have sliding Headers

2003-03-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17676] New: - tag ignores tag body when key is not specified

2003-03-05 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17434] New: - tag should not create sessions

2003-02-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16159] New: - tag in XHTML mode should include alt=""

2003-01-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14173] New: - tag library adds ;jsessionid even if the url is 'javascript:...'.

2002-11-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13854] New: - tag doesn't support "focus" with control arrays

2002-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13569] New: - / tag should handle Map

2002-10-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11914] New: - tag not work with struts action in some containers.

2002-08-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11700] New: - tag throws java.lang.IllegalArgumentException

2002-08-14 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: New Tag

2002-06-26 Thread Matt Raible
Why not just replace: with: I think this is a better way because then you can specify a global-forward in strut-config and use "rewrite forward" if you want to allow someone to change at any time (site-wide). Also, what about this stylesheet syntax: @import url(Re: New Tag
2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes
I'm not aware of anything that accomplishes what you're looking for, however, I've never gone looking for it either :) I would try looking at the JSTL stuff. Struts is headed that way. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H

New Tag

2002-06-26 Thread James Mitchell
Hey James H., Are you aware of any stylesheet tags in the core? One that will render a simple: from something like this: To my knowledge there aren't any. I wrote my own last year, and I'd like to submit it if there's not a similar one. It's 50 lines (including comments, but not license)

Re[2]: [Proposal] New tag to add prefix to bean name

2002-01-17 Thread John Yu
Shall post it next week. At 01:27 pm 16-01-2002 +0300, you wrote: >Hm.. May be it is useful, can you post a code of this tag to the list? > > >> > >>JY> Problem: > >> > >>JY> The 'session' and the 'request' are "global" pools. There is a need to > >>JY> manage the namespace of the attributes sto

Re[2]: [Proposal] New tag to add prefix to bean name

2002-01-16 Thread Oleg V Alexeev
Hello John, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 1:02:09 PM, you wrote: JY> Oleg, JY> The nested tag extension, which I find useful of its own right, solves a JY> completely different problem. JY> helps where you have nested properties. The tag I'm proposing JY> is simply prefixing an bean name, no

Re: [Proposal] New tag to add prefix to bean name

2002-01-16 Thread John Yu
Oleg, The nested tag extension, which I find useful of its own right, solves a completely different problem. helps where you have nested properties. The tag I'm proposing is simply prefixing an bean name, not property, with a prefix. -- John At 12:21 pm 16-01-2002 +0300, you wrote: >Hello J

Re: [Proposal] New tag to add prefix to bean name

2002-01-16 Thread Oleg V Alexeev
Hello John, Take a look to the nested tags - www.keyboardmonkey.com/struts Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 10:12:13 AM, you wrote: JY> Problem: JY> The 'session' and the 'request' are "global" pools. There is a need to JY> manage the namespace of the attributes stored in these pools. In JY> pa

[Proposal] New tag to add prefix to bean name

2002-01-15 Thread John Yu
Problem: The 'session' and the 'request' are "global" pools. There is a need to manage the namespace of the attributes stored in these pools. In particular, when the developers use more of Tiles to componentize the software, there is a need to avoid name clash between the including and includ