On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, V. Cekvenich wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:22:24 -0400
> From: V. Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Official bug list
>
> Would that be offic
Bugzilla is the official repository. Anything unresolved that is not marked LATER is
still on the list for the
next release.
-Ted.
10/16/2002 2:22:24 PM, "V. Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Would that be official?
>It does not have Validator (8787 for example, or other commons, but if
It's as official as I know of (all I did was a query
for open 1.1 bugs in bugzilla). 8787 is a Commons bug
not a Struts bug. Are we counting bugs for dependent
modules? I didn't know that we were.
Yes, I am a committer.
-james
--- "V. Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would that be of
V. Cekvenich wrote:
> There are many ways to run bugzlia report list.
>
> Can someone post the developer official Struts 1.1 list for the people
> that want to help work on a bug and submit solution code to bugzila.
I don't believe there is an "official query". What I do is select
Struts as
Would that be official?
It does not have Validator (8787 for example, or other commons, but if
is or even close than OK, let's see what we can do.
(James are you a commiter? I just want to know how "official" this is")
.V
James Holmes wrote:
> Here's the query I use:
>
>
>http://nagoya.apache
Here's the query I use:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_severity=Blocker&bug_severity=Critical&bug_severity=Major&bug_severity=Normal&bug_severity=Minor&email1=&emailtype1=substring
There are many ways to run bugzlia report list.
Can someone post the developer official Struts 1.1 list for the people
that want to help work on a bug and submit solution code to bugzila.
I see 90 "bugs", but if you can "help us help you".
So a semi official list of real bugs, including commons
