Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-08 Thread Oleg V Alexeev
Hello Martin, Thursday, January 03, 2002, 9:51:08 AM, you wrote: -- Vote: Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1 [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [X] +0 I am in favor of the release, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-04 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
Martin Cooper wrote: > > [ x] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it > Sorry to have not enough time to help for this. Cedric -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-04 Thread Ted Husted
+1 The tlds and dtds are an exension of the code in the JAR, and should travel with it. Ideally, I think there should be a copy of the license in the JAR, and then another in jakarta-struts-lib.zip alongside the other files. -Ted. Martin Cooper wrote: > > Yes, I've (mostly) followed the d

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Martin Cooper
under 'jakarta-struts/lib' directly, or include a copy in 'struts.jar', or both. Comments? -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 03,

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Ted Husted
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > making struts.jar available separately (I read that proposal as being more > for class libraries like the ones in Commons). Who's the target audience? > What will happen when a Struts 1.0-final user sees that, and says "oh, > that must mean I can just drop in the ne

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > > Martin, following up on a dicussion on the General list, can we also > post the Struts-1.0.1.jar in the release directory, and place a copy of > the ASF license in the META-INF directory? > I agree with adding the license file. However, I'm a little n

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > -- > Vote: Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1 > [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it > [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to hel

RE: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread SCHACHTER,MICHAEL (HP-NewJersey,ex2)
-- Vote: Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1 [ ] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it [x] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it [ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Dimitri Valdin
> [x] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it Finally we can get rid of our struts patch, the sole purpose of which was to work with commons :-) I am not sure, that it is a real place to propose this extention. We had to introduce a small patch to ActionServlet in ord

Re: [VOTE] Release Struts 1.0.1-rc1 as Struts 1.0.1

2002-01-03 Thread Ted Husted
> [x] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it Martin, following up on a dicussion on the General list, can we also post the Struts-1.0.1.jar in the release directory, and place a copy of the ASF license in the META-INF directory? This will allow people to download the JAR if