Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Martin Cooper
I haven't actually tried this, but it looks like the source zip would also include all the 'CVS' directories in the tree, along with their contents. If that's the case, you might want to add an 'exclude' in the fileset, since we wouldn't want those files in the distribution. -- Martin Cooper

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 January 2002 21:16 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml I haven't actually tried this, but it looks like the source zip would also include all

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Ted Husted
I just ran it, and it doesn't include the CVS directories. It does nest the scaffold-src.zip inside jakarta-scaffold.zip though, which is probably going to confuse people. Vincent, how about if we go with a jakarta-scaffold.jar and jakarta-scaffold-src.zip in the dist folder. For Artimus,

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Martin Cooper
Ah, OK. I didn't realise that. -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml -Original

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 January 2002 21:26 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml I just ran it, and it doesn't include the CVS directories. It does nest the scaffold

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Martin Cooper
- Original Message - From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:37 PM Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 January 2002 21:53 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml I think what might make the most sense is: jakarta-scaffold.jar jakarta-scaffold

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Ted Husted
Having two distributions for Artimus just doesn't seem useful. It seems sufficient to just have the WAR, and include the source in that. jakarta-artimus.war (with source intact under WEB-INF/src) I've always thought we should do the same thing with the Struts samples, so those WARs could be

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml

2002-01-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold build.xml Ah, OK. I didn't realise that. -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:17 PM Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta