After some deep thought...
(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
It all sounds quite ok as to what it is you're trying to do. I do think
that an efficient routing of the link interaction through JavaScript is
a good thing. It is a very "viewy" thing people want to do.
Looking at it from the end devel
Arron,
Let me preface this email with the understanding that I developed this about
2 months ago and am using it on a site now. So, I haven't thought about it
for a while and so my memory of it might be presumptuous in some areas
(sigh! I wish my mind were a computer). Notes are mingled with your
ECTED]>
> Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
>
> After some deep thought...
> (any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
>
> It all sounds quite ok as to what it is you're trying to do. I do think
> that an efficient routing of the link interaction through Ja
good point
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before
a
3-4860 ext. 258 / Fax 202-463-4863
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
>
>
> Interesting idea.
>
>
>Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before
>adding lots of new functionaltiy ...
>
Not a problem.
>One of the things I learned, in watching the development of JSTL, is that
>tags with lots and lots of optional attributes, and different operating
>modes, can be rea
Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
From: Jose Quinteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===
Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
>>After some deep thought...
>>(any HHGTTG fans out there? :)
>
> What's HHGTTG not familiar with that one. :-)
Hitchhiker&
Correct. :)
Arron.
Struts-dev Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) wrote:
>Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
>From: Jose Quinteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ===
>Phase Web and Multimedia wrote:
>
>>>After some deep thought...
>>>(any HHGTTG
42.
Arron Bates wrote:
> Correct. :)
>
> Arron.
>
> Struts-dev Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) wrote:
>
>> Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.
>> From: Jose Quinteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ===
>> Phase Web and M
