... I'd prefer to see Resources migrate to a presence-based build
> (as opposed to a contrib basis) before promotion. And yes, I'm willing
> to make the change when I have the time to do it. ;-)
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
+1 - and sorry I've been so distant on this...new job is killing me.
--
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:34:10 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> > At 11:59 AM -0500 3/14/04, Ted Husted wrote:
> >> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> > No one is more gung-ho about Struts Chain than I am, but people
> > should be aware tha
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:34:10 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> At 11:59 AM -0500 3/14/04, Ted Husted wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
> No one is more gung-ho about Struts Chain than I am, but people
> should be aware that we're still just into beta with functionality.
>
At 11:59 AM -0500 3/14/04, Ted Husted wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
Is now a good time to coin a "StrutsContext" class that
encapsulates the various arguments to "execute"? I've always kind
of wanted this for Action too. I've frequently thought it would
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:07:18 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
>
>
> Is now a good time to coin a "StrutsContext" class that
> encapsulates the various arguments to "execute"? I've always kind
> of wanted this for Action too. I've frequently thought it would be
> a nice thing. This seems to get a l
