"James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We allow titleKey for the html:frame, altKey and titleKey for
> html:button, and a few others, but do not allow a way to specify the
> bundle or args.
>
> Besides the obvious...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ...work-around,
o: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:05:13 -0500
Unfortunately, you can't use as the value of an
attribute. Are you suggesting that the user does
March 05, 2003 9:41 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes.
>
>
> I definitely don't think we should support replacement args
> because then the
> html tags turn into messaging tags. A bundle att
gt;
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Some taglibs are missing a few common attributes.
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 06:04:08 -0500
We allow titleKey for the html:frame, altKey and titleKey for
htm
> "James" == James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> We allow titleKey for the html:frame, altKey and titleKey for
James> html:button, and a few others, but do not allow a way to specify the
James> bundle or args.
James> Besides the obvious...
James>
Jam
We allow titleKey for the html:frame, altKey and titleKey for
html:button, and a few others, but do not allow a way to specify the
bundle or args.
Besides the obvious...
...work-around, I'm wondering if we should add this.
I think we shouldn't. I think the work-around is a
