Sorry for the late response on this ... it seems like weekends are the
only time I get to play with open source code any more :-(.
See interspersed comments below.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:28:53 -0500
> From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:16:23 -0500
> From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process
>> (although for 1.1 we'd probably implement all this inside a new one
>> that simply replaces the process() method with the appropriate chain
>> lookup and execution.)
For clarity, we probably should be saying the 1.x processor, since we'd
certainly be past 1.1.x before anything like this shipped
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:54:01 -0500
> From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, PILGRIM, Peter, FM wrote:
> In the excitment I got caught up the discussion about customised
> action forward, whereas the original design intention got chucked
> to the side, namely a ``composable request processor''. So let
> me spend some time discussing this:
>
> Now I am
