Sorry for the late response on this ... it seems like weekends are the
only time I get to play with open source code any more :-(.
See interspersed comments below.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 07:28:53 -0500
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
(although for 1.1 we'd probably implement all this inside a new one
that simply replaces the process() method with the appropriate chain
lookup and execution.)
For clarity, we probably should be saying the 1.x processor, since we'd
certainly be past 1.1.x before anything like this shipped.
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:16:23 -0500
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process (was RE:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, PILGRIM, Peter, FM wrote:
In the excitment I got caught up the discussion about customised
action forward, whereas the original design intention got chucked
to the side, namely a ``composable request processor''. So let
me spend some time discussing this:
Now I am at
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Greg Reddin wrote:
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:54:01 -0500
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts Composable Request Process (was RE:
