Re: bugzilla queries

2003-03-20 Thread Ted Husted
David Graham wrote: No. Currently, it looks like Martin thinks we should be using later and Ted thinks we should mark as unknown. I agree more with Martin on this issue. Actually, I was thinking that we couldn't make changes to the ticket or vote on it after it was closed this way, but I see n

Re: bugzilla queries

2003-03-19 Thread David Graham
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_severity=Blocker&bug_severity=Critical&bug_severity=Major&bug_severity=Normal&bug_severity=Minor&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email

bugzilla queries

2003-03-19 Thread ernest . argetsinger
It seems like there's a few different bugzilla queries in use, and I'm confused by the subtle differences. 1) The RC1 release plan links to a query with: Status of UNCONFIRMED, NEW, ASSIGNED, REOPENED, or VERIFIED Program of Struts Version of Nightly Build http://issues.