[Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?

tate=2 nextState=3 forward success -> inHome.jsp thanks in advance, Axel Gross -- http://www.iaeste.at/~

Re: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop?

2003-10-20 at 17:07:31 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > can you elaborate a little? > Too less info :-(( > > > > -----Original Message- > From: Axel Gross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Strut

Re: [Struts Workflow] Test application - why two actions for loop? [solved]

itions, as this basically leaves the nextState definition > effectless." > > Hope that answers your question. > > --- Matthias > > > Axel Gross wrote: > > >Well. > > > >If you take a look at the struts-config.xml you'll see that ther

tiles - smth like addToList?

Hi people! Concerning tiles definition and extension of those. First part-o-mail: concrete problem Second part-o-mail: a more general approach (beginning of it ;) First part: I see the need for extending the entries of a putList without overriding the entries in the super definition. Example:

Re: validation.xml with German Characters (sauch as ü)

Moin zsolt! hi didn't do this before, so i'm not to sure about it. looks like your current problem is a xml related one import the namespace of html, or define the entity by yourself (should be something on selfhtml.teamone.de about it...) if it works with the validator, i don't know besides...

Re: how to use bean:define for this

or maybe use will create a default bean, if it can't find an instance so, if you make a bean which uses the the static method for initialisation of a collections property (in default constructor) you can go without the scriptlet regards, axel On 2004-03-13 at 14:08:13 -0500, Geeta Ramani wrote:

[Q] tiles: defining jsp fragments in a jsp

what i got here is very special layout code which I reuse inside of one jsp and i don't want to remove it from there, because no other jsp would need it. so it would be quite stupid to separate them. i'm trying to achieve this functionality with tiles (so in my case it's a .printMessages tile whic

Re: validation

hi! I don't if you problem is related to your version, do you really need struts 1.0? struts 1.1 you'll find under: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi On 2004-03-16 at 07:50:22 +0100, Otto, Frank wrote: > Thanks for your answer, but it doesn't function. > > I use struts-validation 1.0

[partly answered] Re: Validator: Validation based on action path and not by form name

Hi Kamakshya! yes it is provided. just make it a ValidatorActionForm instead of a ValidatorForm. (check docs for further info) If you use DynaFormBeans, there is a DynaValdaterActionForm, but it never worked for me... hope this help, Axel On 2004-03-18 at 13:40:27 +0900, Prasad, Kamakshya wrote: