>
>property="firstname"/>
>
Is this necessary? I think that child elements should be able to adapt the
namespace from the mother element. Here is couple more examples, what I
meant
about this custom tag question:
or
Street, NW/ 5th Floor / Washington, DC 20036
Phone 202-463-4860 ext. 258 / Fax 202-463-4863
> -Original Message-
> From: Aapo Laakkonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Custom tag question
>
>
> I
"to me more likes"...stinking one handed keyboard...
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Custom tag question
Hey, good idea: +1 :P But I imagine it
Hey, good idea: +1 :P But I imagine it'd have to me more likes:
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alfors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 7:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Custom tag question
If your question is just - &
If your question is just - "Is it possible"? Then the answer is Yes.
However, if you are asking for the current tags to implement this, that is a
totally separate question. That would take some re-work.
Pete
Aapo Laakkonen wrote:
> Is it possible to have custom tags that can have both child e
Is it possible to have custom tags that can have both child elements and
attributes? I mean that in some cases it would be more elegant to use
elements instead of attributes:
or:
text.welcome
instead of this:
Or it would be even more flexible if you could use bot
6 matches
Mail list logo
