[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:27 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts Challenge...
It's my understanding that you ONLY get the default if
there are no other constructors written. The minute
you write ANY constructor, you're o
2003 22:30
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts Challenge...
I have not found this in the spec, but I believe the no-argument constructor
is available at anytime for a concrete class. This would be a good one to
test
-Original Message
Quoting Michael Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It's my understanding that you ONLY get the default if
> there are no other constructors written. The minute
> you write ANY constructor, you're on your own. If you
> still want a default ctor, you've gotta supply it.
>
> I'll be happy to learn s
Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts Challenge...
It's my understanding that you ONLY get the default if
there are no other constructors written. The minute
you write ANY constructor, you're on your own. If you
still want a default ctor, you've gotta supply it.
I
ete/abstract class vs. as an interface.
>
> Besides, I like what you've created. :-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:55 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts
eider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:55 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts Challenge...
Quoting Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A few comments:
>
> 1. I got runtime errors when I declared a DynaActionForm be
put a "do" before "implement" and ELs are just scripting in disguise.
Bloody Aussie.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Re: 4th Of July Struts Chal
Quoting Mark Galbreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A few comments:
>
> 1. I got runtime errors when I declared a DynaActionForm bean of type Map;
> I had to declare it of type HashMap.
Not sure what you're doing, but the example works as coded. If it matters, post
some details and we'll see if somet
whereas an expression
is merely "the value of 1 + 1".
I guess you've been using LISP too long to understand the difference eh? ;->
-Original Message-
From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:12
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Su
A few comments:
1. I got runtime errors when I declared a DynaActionForm bean of type Map;
I had to declare it of type HashMap.
2. You may be using JSTL, but it still looks like scripting to me.
3. Strictly speaking, JavaBeans do not contain a constructor and implement
Serializable.
Mark
10 matches
Mail list logo
