ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:09:42 -0700
Sorry, when I say the javascript validation is "broken" I mean the
validation falls through to the
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:16:02 -0700
In our last episode, I downloaded the 3/20 nightly build and
discovered that adding a requiredif depends
ply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:16:02 -0700
In our last episode, I downloaded the 3/20 nightly build and discove
PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:16:40 -0500
That would be me. For
From: Bruce Geerdes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 4:55 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
I no longer get the javascript client-side validation. It falls through
to the server. (*All* validation, even for f
a js expert, or even intermediate.)
Bruce
David Graham wrote:
How does your js break?
David
From: Bruce Geerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date
How does your js break?
David
From: Bruce Geerdes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:28:37 -0700
Did this solve the
f distracting :-).
David
From: "James Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fie
ords without specifying a
shortDiagnosisDescription or diagnosisDescription. Not sure about radio
buttons having values of 'Off' though.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Valid
ription or diagnosisDescription. Not sure about radio
buttons having values of 'Off' though.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kyser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:52 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
An uns
dicate that. Thanks to all the help thus far.
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
That would be me. For the moment,
An unselected radio button is not submitted to the server so it is null.
David
From: Jeff Kyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditi
ated
differently? Looking at the validateRequiredIf method doesn't seem to
indicate that. Thanks to all the help thus far.
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: 1.
;t seem to
indicate that. Thanks to all the help thus far.
-Original Message-
From: James Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:17 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
That would be me. Fo
t;
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:08:26 -0500
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Condi
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
>
>
> Wow, I've never seen a guy so preoccupied w
x27;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:46:13 -0500
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
>
>
> You can't use field-* anymore. It generates inval
--
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Are there any other examples of using conditionally required fields
for
the validator? I find the example here a bit confusi
r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:16:40 -0500
That would be me
3 10:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
>
>
> >Are there any other examples of using conditionally required
> fields for
> >the validator? I find the example here a bit confusing.
>
> You're not the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1.1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
>Are there any other examples of using conditionally required fields for
>the validator? I find the example here a bit confusing.
You&#x
1 rc1 -Validator: Conditionally required fields.
>Are there any other examples of using conditionally required fields for
>the validator? I find the example here a bit confusing.
You're not the only one. I still haven't figured it out although I
haven't
spent much time wi
Are there any other examples of using conditionally required fields for
the validator? I find the example here a bit confusing.
You're not the only one. I still haven't figured it out although I haven't
spent much time with it. A committer (can't remember which one) has
developed an easier vali
24 matches
Mail list logo
