Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-12-16 Thread Susan Bradeen
> From: "Susan Bradeen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:53 PM > Subject: Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found > > > > > > Martin, > > > > J

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-12-15 Thread Martin Gainty
mismatch I have none of the ini files you mentioned on my system Suggestions? Martin - Original Message - From: "Susan Bradeen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: Re: Of

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-12-15 Thread Susan Bradeen
Martin, Just in case this might be useful, the following is from a WebSpherePro Developer's Tips email newsletter (11/20/2003). Hope it helps, Susan Bradeen RUNNING WSAD WITH JVM 1.4 I've been happy running WebSphere Studio Application Developer (WSAD) using IBM's JDK 1.3.1, but I recently work

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-12-15 Thread Martin Gainty
Kirk et al Back on this thread with no resolution I dont want to uninstall the existing JRE 1.41_02 as other environments are using the latest version I would like to run Websphere in "isolated space" but keep knocking into the "a suitable JVM could not be found" Anyone have a solution? Thanks, -Ma

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread Kirk Wylie
Steve Raeburn wrote: I can't find the details right now, but I have a vague recollection that the IBM JDK includes an RMI-IIOP implementation that is a requirement for Websphere. So you won't be able to switch to a non-IBM JDK. There actually is a package that you can use for a Java client to pr

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread Doug
Martin Gainty wrote: Way off topic but I'm stumped Websphere 5 When attempting to do run any Java Process from Websphere I get "A suitable JVM could not be found" I know Websphere likes to install their own IBM JDK1.31 but I want to retain my SUN JDK 1.41 for obvious reasons Has anyone seen thi

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread ian_d_stewart
244-2564 "Martin Gainty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/21/2003 01:49:45 PM Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM cou

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread Martin Gainty
/2003 01:37:22 PM > > Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > > Subject: Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found > > > > Steve-

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread ian_d_stewart
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:54 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found > I can't find the details right now, but I have a vague recollection that the > IBM JDK inclu

Re: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-21 Thread Martin Gainty
OTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 6:54 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found > I can't find the details right now, but I have a vague recollection that the > IBM JDK includes an RMI-IIOP implementation that is a requirement for > Websphere. So y

RE: Off Topic: A suitable JVM could not be found

2003-10-20 Thread Steve Raeburn
I can't find the details right now, but I have a vague recollection that the IBM JDK includes an RMI-IIOP implementation that is a requirement for Websphere. So you won't be able to switch to a non-IBM JDK. If you're running just about anything except Windows, you may be able to use an updated IBM