-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Wendy Smoak wrote:
-----
As for working on the example... would any changes have a
chance of getting
committed before 1.1 final, or should I just wait until
that's finished?
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:49:15 -0700
From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
This appears
Craig wrote:
Again, that's a carryover from the 1.0 (pre-dynabeans) approach.
We should definitely clean this up to avoid confusion.
I hate to complain, but the example really is confusing. It also has a
bunch of code that makes you think you need to instantiate ActionForms
yourself:
Craig wrote:
For this specific case, there is no reason to have a LogonForm class at
all, because the default behavior of a DynaValidatorForm (which is a
DynaActionForm plus using the validator framework to define validation
rules) does everything you need.
Wow... I just deleted the
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:50:56 -0700
From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
Craig
/snip
Confused again. (I will need a custom validate method.) How
does Struts know to start with my class that extends
DynaWhateverForm and add the stuff in the form-bean tag to
it, rather than creating a new one? Would it be:
form-bean name=logonForm
: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:14 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
Craig wrote:
For this specific case, there is no reason to have a LogonForm class at
all, because the default behavior of a DynaValidatorForm (which is a
DynaActionForm
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:14:25 -0700
From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
Craig
: RE: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
Craig wrote:
Again, that's a carryover from the 1.0 (pre-dynabeans) approach.
We should definitely clean this up to avoid confusion.
I hate to complain, but the example really is confusing.
Don't feel bad!!! None
Actually, there *is* a case when form will be passed as a null -- if
someone were to modify the struts-config.xml entry for this action, and
accidentally (or on purpose) remove the name or attribute attribute.
Then, the controller servlet would assume that no form bean needs to be
created, so
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Wendy Smoak wrote:
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:56:54 -0700
From: Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about struts-example struts-config.xml
11 matches
Mail list logo
