RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Andrew Hill
Subject: Re: Request v Page scope? I thought the British were too busy having sexual intercourse with cabin boys to busy themselves with humor. BAL - Original Message - From: "Chappell, Simon P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Andrew Hill
Scriptlets are Bad. N'kay? -Original Message- From: Howard Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 04:09 To: struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? What was that about scriptlets?? ...thanks Simon, HM On 15 Oct 2002 at

Re: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Howard Miller wrote: > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 20:45:10 +0100 > From: Howard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Request v Page scope? >

Re: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Brian Alexander Lee
ber 15, 2002 5:29 PM Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? We do "get" today's jokes, but the reason that we don't laugh is that they usually aren't funny! >-Original Message- >From: John Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:51 PM

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Chappell, Simon P
Huh? You'll have to explain that one, as I can't find anything approaching humour in there. >-Original Message- >From: Miller, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:49 PM >To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' >Subject: RE: R

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Chappell, Simon P
We do "get" today's jokes, but the reason that we don't laugh is that they usually aren't funny! >-Original Message- >From: John Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:51 PM >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Subject: Re:

Re: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread John Owen
2 3:44 PM Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? When America can compete with Monty Python, America may have an opinion on humour! :-P Simon >-Original Message- >From: Adam Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:42 PM >To: Struts Users Mailing List

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Miller, Jason
I never knew professional baseball players were interested in web applications. > That would explain why I thought it was funny ... being a > British chap myself and all that. (Never appologise for your > British humour, these yankees don't have any humour of their > own, so they should be gr

[OT] British Humor? (was RE: Request v Page scope?)

2002-10-15 Thread Jerry Jalenak
n. Jerry > -Original Message- > From: Chappell, Simon P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:45 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? > > > When America can compete with Monty Python, Am

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread James Mitchell
IL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? > > > That would explain why I thought it was funny ... being a British > chap myself and all that. (Never appologise for your British > humour, these yankees don't have any humour of their own, so they > should be gratef

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Chappell, Simon P
When America can compete with Monty Python, America may have an opinion on humour! :-P Simon >-Original Message- >From: Adam Sherman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:42 PM >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? >

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Adam Sherman
On 10/15/02 15:23:44 -0500, Chappell, Simon P wrote: > That would explain why I thought it was funny ... being a British chap > myself and all that. (Never appologise for your British humour, these > yankees don't have any humour of their own, so they should be grateful > that we share any of ours

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Chappell, Simon P
-- >From: Howard Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:18 PM >To: struts Users Mailing List >Subject: RE: Request v Page scope? > > >E it was a joke :) > >Please excuse my twisted British humor! > >HM > >On 15 Oct 2002 at

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Howard Miller
E it was a joke :) Please excuse my twisted British humor! HM On 15 Oct 2002 at 16:14, Adam Sherman wrote: > On 10/15/02 21:09:28 +0100, Howard Miller wrote: > > What was that about scriptlets?? > > Scriptlets are embedded bits of Java code in your JSP pages. They are a Bad > Thing(

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Howard Miller
What was that about scriptlets?? ...thanks Simon, HM On 15 Oct 2002 at 14:53, Chappell, Simon P wrote: > In a nutshell (I'll let someone else explain the slow version) the page scope is for >information that only literally exists for the duration of time taken to render a >page. This is obvi

RE: Request v Page scope?

2002-10-15 Thread Chappell, Simon P
In a nutshell (I'll let someone else explain the slow version) the page scope is for information that only literally exists for the duration of time taken to render a page. This is obviously not a very long period of time and not terribly useful in Struts, but it is a defined scope according to