Re: Struts 1.1b1 HTML:Form

2002-07-01 Thread Ted Husted
The change you are running into is that in 1.1 the html:form tag now calls the reset() method. That was not the case in 1.0 so the bean type wasn't as important. But, if your "legacy" JavaBeans and ActionForms share the same property names (or "protocol"), you can use those beans to write the fo

RE: Struts 1.1b1 HTML:Form

2002-07-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jacob Hookom wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 12:32:11 -0500 > From: Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE

RE: Struts 1.1b1 HTML:Form

2002-07-01 Thread Jacob Hookom
ssage- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:06 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1b1 HTML:Form It is correct to say that all of the automatic Struts machinery for form beans only works if your bean is a subclass of ActionForm.

Re: Struts 1.1b1 HTML:Form

2002-07-01 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
It is correct to say that all of the automatic Struts machinery for form beans only works if your bean is a subclass of ActionForm. (In Struts 1.1, that includes the DynaActionForm class as well.) Craig On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jacob Hookom wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 01:23:40 -0500 > From: Jac