t; Sent: 13 June 2002 18:35
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
>
>
>
> We may be heading off topic here... I started out at the tail end of
> that era... I swore an oath that I would never work on a mainframe and
> managed to
core dumps, anyone?
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
>
>
>
> We may be heading off t
Yeah, you can. That's why their called 'Enterprise Servers' now-a-days.
(:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
We
Niall?)
(incidentally the above was in jest - I hear you can run Linux on them
now...)
-Original Message-
From: Jerry.Jalenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 1:00 PM
To: struts-user
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
Hard to believe
rom: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
I saw this thread and thought..."great, flame war...", but you guys are too
nice.
IMHO I suggest you learn from t
rsonally, iterative development has worked in most of the projects I
> have been on and run.
>
> Thats all from here...
>
> PS. Are the project managers old mainframe programmers or something?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: josephb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
Yeah, those were the days (sigh). I suspected that was what you meant, but
couldn't resist.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. que
times were in years, not weeks...
:)
-Original Message-
From: Jerry.Jalenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:19 AM
To: struts-user
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
As an 'old mainframe programmer' I resent this. (:-)
As an 'old mainframe programmer' I resent this. (:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
I tend to agree on this. I
ne 12, 2002 7:54 PM
To: struts-user
Subject: RE: Struts Design/construction process. question
This reminds me of the adage a former professor of mine used to preach:
"It is much easier to build a program than to give birth to one."
The "pump out a list of components" and "wh
You might take a look at the Artimus example application.
http://husted.com/struts/resources/artimus.zip
This doesn't use custom Actions classes for most operations, and the
ones I did use were mostly for show. There's a single framework Action
that calls a business operation, the same way the
This reminds me of the adage a former professor of mine used to preach:
"It is much easier to build a program than to give birth to one."
The "pump out a list of components" and "while bringing the page to life"
parts of your message make it sound an awful lot like your project
management is invo
12 matches
Mail list logo
