RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-19 Thread Assenza, Chris
XP is great, but it's not necessarily new. People have been doing rapid agile development for years and just might not know it by that name. The real value is the fact that it can be molded for any situation and it's not the type of methodology where you MUST follow every step. If you can't do

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-18 Thread Andrew Hill
usted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 09:44 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) Kent Beck's book, Extreme Programming Explained, covers all these issues in-depth. Anyone who's the least bit interested in XP should read this b

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Andrew Hill
itical bug arises it would get priority. Basically its just a case of applying common sense. -Original Message- From: Kenneth Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 01:35 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) I have two que

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Ted Husted
Kent Beck's book, Extreme Programming Explained, covers all these issues in-depth. Anyone who's the least bit interested in XP should read this book first. It's less than 200 pages and covers all the bases. -Ted. Stan Baranek wrote: > ok - devil's advocate: > > Open Workspace - done it. grea

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Tiago Nodari
Now whenever my boss asks me why Im just watching the >>screen and not doing anything I can reply: "Im doing XP!") >> >>Seriously though, I dont think I could stand using a method other than XP. >>It would be s inefficient and slow, and troublesome, and error p

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Kenneth Stout
I have two questions for those using XP. 1) How is a programmers performance evaluated within the XP pair programming model? When dealing with humans you will occasionally end up someone that is simply not measuring up.(everyone on this list excluded of course ;-). The HR department will want som

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Stan Baranek
thod other than XP. >It would be s inefficient and slow, and troublesome, and error prone. >How did people survive before XP > > >-Original Message- >From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 03:31 >To: 'Struts Users

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Cliff Rowley
> C liff might be thinking of this: > > http://strutstestcase.sourceforge.net/ Yep, that's it :) > -Ted. -- Regards --- Cliff Rowley| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software Engineer | www.doctype.co.uk +44 (0) 1206 514263 | www.cliffrowley.com -

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Cliff Rowley
- > > From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:36 PM > > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > > Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) > > > > > > Actually, in all the market slump and government

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-17 Thread Ted Husted
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: >Part of my problem is that the nature of open source development has been >much more "loners communicating via CVS commits" and I grew pretty >comfortable with that :-). > Personally, I'd say you, and many others at Jakarta, practice a lot of team programming. It's as

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Andrew Hill
slow, and troublesome, and error prone. How did people survive before XP -Original Message- From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 03:31 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) XP is a Communist conspi

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Dan Cancro
ROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:36 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) > > > Actually, in all the market slump and government funding cutbacks, our > CS department is growing-- dramatically, in addition, it&#

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On 16 Aug 2002, Cliff Rowley wrote: > Date: 16 Aug 2002 22:00:32 +0100 > From: Cliff Rowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsof

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Jacob Hookom
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:33 PM | To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' | Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) | | It sounds like they are using XP just to go cheap on outfitting the labs. | | -Original Message- | From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAI

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Cliff Rowley
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 21:19, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > I've used similar pieces of XP's philosophy as well - especially the > daily integration stuff. (One example is Sun's JWSDP, where I was the > implementation architect - one of the things we did was build the entire > thing from source eve

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Chappell, Simon P wrote: > Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 13:17:16 -0500 > From: "Chappell, Simon P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Tim T. Young
Why is it that everytime I read Agile/XP related material, I feel energized, inspired and positive, but everytime I am asked to fill out a Project Definition Report/Architecture Diagram/Test Planblahblah(TPS Report)blahblah, I feel drained, suffocated, and wasteful? From the resources on the art

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Galbreath, Mark
XP is a Communist conspiracy. -Original Message- From: Cliff Rowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:01 PM A bit of off-topic, but it's Friday, so there :) Today I read an new article on IBM developerWorks on eXtreme Programming, in which the author pretty much

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Cliff Rowley
> > Good! You can try version 2.6 with an evaluation key, but instead I > strongly suggest trying out their latest build (640)--it's amazingly better > than 2.6. You can get the latest build by joining their free Early Access > Program (http://www.intellij.com/eap/). The EAP builds also come w

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Bartley, Chris P
> -Original Message- > From: Cliff Rowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:32 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) > > [snip] > > Not tried IntelliJ, will go and see what the fuss is

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Smiley, Stuart
It sounds like they are using XP just to go cheap on outfitting the labs. -Original Message- From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:30 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind) Our CS program on

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Cliff Rowley
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 19:19, Bartley, Chris P wrote: > We used it at my old job, and i really miss it. I was *really* skeptical at > first, but quickly grew to love it. Great way to learn, have fun, and > actually get a *lot* of work done. We found that even pairing people with > rather differe

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Jacob Hookom
Our CS program on campus is going all XP development. Granted they make us learn how to do all of the Design/Requirement/Analysis FUD, but our new labs are all setup for group programming around 2 or 3 monitors at once in a corner desk. If anything, it makes you write more flexible code, with le

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Bartley, Chris P
We used it at my old job, and i really miss it. I was *really* skeptical at first, but quickly grew to love it. Great way to learn, have fun, and actually get a *lot* of work done. We found that even pairing people with rather different areas of expertise (e.g. EJBs vs web tier) still worked ou

RE: XP (and not the Microsoft kind)

2002-08-16 Thread Chappell, Simon P
We're using some pieces of XP here on our project. I know that they say you should do all or nothing, but we didn't, so there! :-P The pieces that we are using (and that we like) are: 1. regular daily integrations and full system builds. 2. A full time business person on the team. 3. some pair