Re: user active vs. user role

2003-03-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Dan Allen wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:14:16 -0600 > From: Dan Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: user active vs. user role > > Just a quick little security question here. Do you think

RE: user active vs. user role

2003-03-21 Thread Jacob Hookom
extra field called "status" to set the field to "deleted" or "inactive" if need be. -Jacob | -Original Message- | From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 2:17 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: user active vs. user ro

Re: user active vs. user role

2003-03-21 Thread David Graham
List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: user active vs. user role Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:42:30 -0600 David Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I would use a database field for this so every app. accessing the database > can use the feature. Even if you only have one app. now, you may h

Re: user active vs. user role

2003-03-21 Thread Dan Allen
David Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I would use a database field for this so every app. accessing the database > can use the feature. Even if you only have one app. now, you may have more > in the future. > > David So you are saying a field with 'isActive' of type boolean (or whatever

Re: user active vs. user role

2003-03-21 Thread David Graham
I would use a database field for this so every app. accessing the database can use the feature. Even if you only have one app. now, you may have more in the future. David From: Dan Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje