Re: workflow extension question

our help and thought! -- adam - Original Message - From: "Matthias Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:20 AM Subject: Re: workflow extension question Adam, sorry that I obviously did n

Re: workflow extension question

easily be achieved using your framework? Thank you again for all your help and thought! -- adam - Original Message - From: "Matthias Bauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:20 AM Subje

Re: workflow extension question

Adam, sorry that I obviously did not make myself clear enough. Look at the following definitions: global-forwards: workflowViolation_wiz1step1: violatedWizard1Step1 workflowViolation_wiz1step2: violatedWizard1Step2 displayWizard1Step1 primaryWorkflow: wiz1step1 newState: displayed nextState: sub

Re: workflow extension question

Or can they co-exist together nicely ? Thanks for your help. -- adam From: Matthias Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: workflow extension question Date: Mon, 06 Oct 200

Re: workflow extension question

Adam, there is a solution to your requirement. If I get you right, here is what you want to do: You are in a modal dialog. If the user clicks on some link he violates the workflow. The action that violates the workflow should check whether this is a nextState violation. Upon nextState violatio

RE: workflow extension question

Hi, I think what you are saying (The scenarios you have described )is not possible with the current workflow implementation. Because when a user leaves a workflow(Like you said, he is bored and clicks on a menu link.), then there is a workflow violation and the workFLow for whicch this violation