Re: What it will take for a 1.1 release... (was RE: Struts 1.1 Release)

2002-10-18 Thread Vilya Harvey
> >Because of all these having been incorporated, I think Struts is now way > >past something that should have been called a 1.1 release. According to the ... > Well, a little perspective is necessary here -- Tiles and Validator > have been in the 1.1 mix since well before 1.1.b2. I do believe tha

Re: What it will take for a 1.1 release... (was RE: Struts 1.1 Release)

2002-10-18 Thread Thomas Eichberger
I think the same:-) A beta 3 would help us with the customer. Thomas At 11:08 17.10.2002 +0100, Vilya Harvey wrote: > >Because of all these having been incorporated, I think Struts is now way > >past something that should have been called a 1.1 release. According to the ... > Well, a little p

Re: What it will take for a 1.1 release... (was RE: Struts 1.1 Release)

2002-10-16 Thread Vilya Harvey
> From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ... > From that, you'd think a 1.1 release was just around the corner!! > However, it's not going to be that easy. My Bugzilla query turns up > 39 non-Enhancement open bugs against Struts. Some of these are very > old and may no longer be relevant.

RE: What it will take for a 1.1 release... (was RE: Struts 1.1 Release)

2002-10-16 Thread Kosh . Podder
Guys, Before I say anything more, I'd just like to say that it's great to see the discussion taking place here... >From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 16 October 2002 00:35 >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Subject: What it will take for a 1.1 release.