RE: Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map?

2003-12-03 Thread Hookom, Jacob
y is an integer, but leave the type definition as String in all cases on your ActionForm. -Jake -Original Message- From: Philip Seay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:02 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Why isn't an ActionForm ju

RE: Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map?

2003-12-03 Thread Philip Seay
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:58 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map? One guess would be because then you would lose some of the methods which provide more functionality than just a TransferObject

RE: Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map?

2003-12-03 Thread Fullam, Jonathan
AM To: struts Subject: Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map? This question is from the table of contents of a text book. I dont have this book in hand. I have other questions also. Why ActionForm is made Struts dependent ?. Why not use just plain JavaBean whch can be used as TransferObject. ?

Why isn't an ActionForm just a Map?

2003-12-03 Thread Antony Paul
This question is from the table of contents of a text book. I dont have this book in hand. I have other questions also. Why ActionForm is made Struts dependent ?. Why not use just plain JavaBean whch can be used as TransferObject. ? rgds Antony Paul ---