RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread David Graham
:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken. I don't think that works. I'm basing this on what I've read here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#h-4.8 and here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_4 David >From: "

RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread Raible, Matt
Probably best to follow the specs then. My comment was based on experience. Matt -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken. I

RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken. Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:23:32 -0700 For the Javascript, I think that Struts should use the following syntax for all javascript

RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread David Graham
script tag. Nothing like that will be done for 1.1, if at all. I've just been thinking about it. David From: "James Childers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[E

RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread Raible, Matt
ary 15, 2003 10:17 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken. > I'm thinking about adding a boolean attribute to the > javascript tag called xhtmlStrict. If set to true, > it would use a CDATA section; if false it would

RE: xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread James Childers
> I'm thinking about adding a boolean attribute to the > javascript tag called xhtmlStrict. If set to true, > it would use a CDATA section; if false it wouldn't. > The default would be false to allow maximum useability > while still allowing you to conform to xhtml. > > Thoughts on the att

xhtml javascript WAS: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread David Graham
AIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: html:text tags are slightly broken. Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:11:20 -0700 This has been fixed in Struts 1.1b3 - y

RE: html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread Raible, Matt
n green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:20 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: html:text tags are slightly broken. The html generated by the html:text tag is html compliant, but not XML compliant. It is missing a closing . This does not pose a problem if the ou

html:text tags are slightly broken.

2003-01-15 Thread julian green
The html generated by the html:text tag is html compliant, but not XML compliant. It is missing a closing . This does not pose a problem if the output of the jsp is rendered by a browser, but I am using XSLT to decorate the page before the browser sees it. This tag therefore generates XML er