Re: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit

Hello, The JSP size limit is per page, not per request. You should be able to split a little bit more the faulty page/tiles, using tiles to stay coherent with your approach, or . Also, considering using less tags is a good option (like instead of multiple ). Cedric Jerry

RE: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit

: Jerry Jalenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 3:55 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit I've tried the second option, that of splitting the page up, but have had problems with it. We are basing all of our JSP on

RE: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit

see if it will work for me Thanks! Jerry -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:44 PM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit One option (pardon the pun!) is to use the tag i

RE: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit

alenak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 12:39 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Tiles exceeding JSP size limit > > > Hi All, > > I've got a JSP with multiple drop downs with 50-60 options > per drop down. > Along with the oth

Tiles exceeding JSP size limit

Hi All, I've got a JSP with multiple drop downs with 50-60 options per drop down. Along with the other 30 or so text boxes I have, I'm exceeding the JSP size limit. How have others handled this? I looked at the mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Exceeding JSP Size Limit w/ Tiles

I've run into the JSP size limitation on a couple of my JSP's (built with Tiles). I've tried to split out a set of common statements that get used several times in the page (a list of US states), but I haven't figured out how to 'include' this list back into the JSP. I've tried using and but

Re: jsp size limit?

OTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:06 AM Subject: RE: jsp size limit? > Wasn't it Bill Gates who said, "64k ought to be enough for anybody?" > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:31 PM

RE: jsp size limit?

You know it! Thanks for the recognition. In between compiles I love an ego-stroke from this list. -Original Message- From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:34 AM ...he's "always the man". Arron. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: jsp size limit?

Page buffer sets the size of the buffer defining when content is flushed, has nothing to do with class size. Java wont use a class larger than 64k. We also have to give thanks for Mark for passing on good paying customers when he's dropped them because he's "always the man"/ignorant. Arron.

RE: jsp size limit?

rface directly with them much and can concentrate on cutting code. Quite a refreshing change. ) -Original Message- From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 21:30 To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: jsp size limit? You would build

RE: jsp size limit?

o the morons of the world. It gives me something to show clients on how NOT to do it. Mark -Original Message- From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:45 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: jsp size limit? As much as the customer wants. -Ori

RE: jsp size limit?

Just because you CAN does not mean you SHOULD. If his compiled file is over 8kb, then some serious refactoring needs to be considered. Mark -Original Message- From: Christopher Barham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:31 AM Hi Kevin, Have you tried upping the buf

RE: jsp size limit?

Wasn't it Bill Gates who said, "64k ought to be enough for anybody?" -Original Message- From: Joseph Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 7:31 PM Is this really such a bad thing? If someone is writing java classes that compile to >64K, I think they may need t

RE: jsp size limit?

Hi Kevin, Have you tried upping the buffer size in the page directive? (it's only 8kb by default, (JSP spec not a container limitation) and if autoflush is on then that will cause problems): <%@ page buffer=40kb %> Chris On Thu, 9 May 2002 11:46 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The issue I had

RE: jsp size limit?

As much as the customer wants. -Original Message- From: Joseph Barefoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 08:45 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: jsp size limit? True. 'Course, that begs the question: how much content should you really have on a s

RE: jsp size limit?

I learnt to program on a BBC Micro back in '84. I had no issues with 64k limits - the machine only had 32k total :-) -Original Message- From: Malcolm Dew-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 03:19 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: jsp size limit?

RE: jsp size limit?

True. 'Course, that begs the question: how much content should you really have on a single page? > -Original Message- > From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:25 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: jsp size lim

Re: jsp size limit?

I think they may need to revisit their object-oriented >principles. ;) > >>-Original Message- >>From: Malcolm Dew-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:19 PM >>To: Struts Users Mailing List >>Subject: Re: jsp size limit? >> &g

RE: jsp size limit?

> To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: jsp size limit? > > > > > > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Arron Bates wrote: > > > There's a limitation on the size of a compliled Java class. Java has > > this arbitrary limit of 62k for a compiled class. Looks like

RE: jsp size limit?

You think that's bad, you should see my procedure division. JM > -Original Message- > From: Malcolm Dew-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:19 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: jsp size limit? > > > > >

Re: jsp size limit?

On Thu, 9 May 2002, Arron Bates wrote: > There's a limitation on the size of a compliled Java class. Java has > this arbitrary limit of 62k for a compiled class. Looks like you're In 1986 Macintosh computers had the same 64K code barrier. Compiled units of code had to be split into chunks