RE: FormTag problem

2001-10-22 Thread Alexander Jesse
Hi, does your jsp include the tag ? If not, add and retry regards Alexander -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FormTag problem Hi I'm having a problem with the form tag. The pr

Re: FormTag problem

2001-01-29 Thread Anand Raman
hi Howard sorry for the late response but what kind of a mapping have u specified in the web.xml file. I think that too matters a lot to rightly match all the actions.. Thanks Anand On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 05:40:29PM -, Howard Moore wrote: >I have the following action configured in my strut

Re: FormTag problem

2001-01-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
is Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 26 January 2001 11:31 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: re: FormTag problem > > > > > > You're right, I only considered going from a .jsp to .do > > within the same > > path. Also, I didn't rea

RE: FormTag problem

2001-01-26 Thread Howard Moore
e- > From: Chris Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 26 January 2001 11:31 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: re: FormTag problem > > > You're right, I only considered going from a .jsp to .do > within the same > path. Also, I didn't realise I had a

re: FormTag problem

2001-01-26 Thread Chris Smith
You're right, I only considered going from a .jsp to .do within the same path. Also, I didn't realise I had access to the PageContext from the TagSupport class. Thanks. I didn't like the idea of adding a slash to the action mapping just because it didn't have one. I wanted to be able to use

RE: FormTag problem

2001-01-25 Thread Howard Moore
s are handled in ActionServlet. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 25 January 2001 15:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: re: FormTag problem > > > The problem is because the action in the jsp form tag is > being

re: FormTag problem

2001-01-25 Thread Chris Smith
The problem is because the action in the jsp form tag is being used for two purposes - for the generated HTML and for looking up the ActionMapping. If you have the directory path in the form tag and modify FormTag.java so it doesn't strip it out, struts will generate the HTML page for you. Bu

RE: FormTag problem

2001-01-24 Thread Howard Moore
; From: Mike Fitterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24 January 2001 16:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: re: FormTag problem > > > Don't know if this helps but it sure seems like it (this is > from the doc): > > There are two common approaches to defining the

RE: FormTag problem

2001-01-24 Thread Byomakesh Parida
t: 24 January 2001 16:10 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: re: FormTag problem Don't know if this helps but it sure seems like it (this is from the doc): There are two common approaches to defining the URLs that will be processed by the controller servlet -- prefix matching and extension ma

re: FormTag problem

2001-01-24 Thread Mike Fitterman
Don't know if this helps but it sure seems like it (this is from the doc): There are two common approaches to defining the URLs that will be processed by the controller servlet -- prefix matching and extension matching. An appropriate mapping entry for each approach will be described below. Pre

re: FormTag problem

2001-01-24 Thread Chris Smith
Sorry, if I was subscribed to the list, I'd have attached this to Howard Moore's message. I agree, I don't understand why the FormTag is stripping the path from the ".do" action. This forces you to have all your jsp's in the context root, not arranged in directories. I don't want to change m