Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shelling Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> hi all,
>> as I experienced,open and read from files like
>> /sys/devices/platform/smapi/ac_connected just blocked and nothing
>> happened,anyone can tell me why?
This is SBCL demanding POSIX semantics vs Linux' "i
Shelling Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi all,
> as I experienced,open and read from files like
> /sys/devices/platform/smapi/ac_connected just blocked and nothing
> happened,anyone can tell me why?
>
> I've tried sbcl 1.0.15 and 1.0.17,both the same problem
Have you tried the old versions o
Ian Ross wrote:
Hi Tassilo,
That doesn't sound too hard to deal with, and neither does Jim Ottaway's
request about multiple batteries. I don't have access to a machine with
a 2.6.25 kernel at the moment, but if no-one has done this by the end of
the summer when I should have some more free time
Hi Tassilo,
That doesn't sound too hard to deal with, and neither does Jim Ottaway's
request about multiple batteries. I don't have access to a machine with
a 2.6.25 kernel at the moment, but if no-one has done this by the end of
the summer when I should have some more free time, I'll sort it out
"Bill Clementson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Since you're making mods to battery.lisp, how about making BAT0 a
> defvar instead of hard-coding it. On my laptop, the directory is
> "CMB0" instead of "BAT0".
And with kernels 2.6.25+ the whole stuff has moved to
/sys/class/power_supply/ and
Since you're making mods to battery.lisp, how about making BAT0 a defvar
instead of hard-coding it. On my laptop, the directory is "CMB0" instead of
"BAT0".
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Ian Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Remove all run-shell-command calls in contrib/battery.lisp and re
- Remove all run-shell-command calls in contrib/battery.lisp and replace
with native file processing.
---
contrib/battery.lisp | 44 ++--
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/battery.lisp b/contrib/battery.lisp
index
