On 2014-07-28 16:31, Venkatesh Shukla wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
So I see regular updates from Gehad (HTML export) and Andrey (IOS
Companion), but I feel like I don’t really know where we are regarding
libdivecomputer on Android and dive computer configuratio
On 2014-07-28 15:47, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
So I see regular updates from Gehad (HTML export) and Andrey (IOS
Companion), but I feel like I don’t really know where we are regarding
libdivecomputer on Android and dive computer configuration from
Subsurface. Venkatesh and Joseph, could you send your l
On July 28, 2014 11:30:56 PM CEST, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Anton Lundin
>wrote:
>>
>> All those things already exist in the current "port" to android, but
>> still, the download from divecomputer dialog is unusable.
>> (Btw, have any one of you tested the curre
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Anton Lundin wrote:
>
> All those things already exist in the current "port" to android, but
> still, the download from divecomputer dialog is unusable.
> (Btw, have any one of you tested the current "port"?)
Ahh. I tested the subsurface port in May, not since th
On Monday 28 July 2014 09:22:40 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > The UI becomes too small to be used on a phone and it's not stetically
> > appealing to be used on Tablet.
>
> Yes, I've seen that. But I've also talked to both you and Thiago about
> ways to address that.
>
> I WANT to use Qt for this - tha
On Monday 28 July 2014 09:58:44 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > True in Qt4, false in Qt5. in Qt5 QML uses OpenGL directly so it
> > should be faster / smoother than QGraphicsView.
>
> But that still means we are developing a different UI. Yes, at least it
> would be the same for IOS and Android (I assume
On 28 July, 2014 - Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:56:01AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > also only show one Subsurface view at a time?
> >
> > Showing just one of the split windows at a time and swipi
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Tomaz Canabrava
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
> > On 28 July 2014 20:33, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> dunno, my tests were based on Qt5.2 for Win32.
>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:56:01AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
> >
> > also only show one Subsurface view at a time?
>
> Showing just one of the split windows at a time and swiping between
> the divelist / profile / notes subwindows
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 20:33, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> dunno, my tests were based on Qt5.2 for Win32.
>>> RotationAnimation on a declarative image, 15% CPU on a dual core w
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
>
> also only show one Subsurface view at a time?
Showing just one of the split windows at a time and swiping between
the divelist / profile / notes subwindows would be a huge improvement
already.
Sure, it would still be tiny on a phone,
On 28 July 2014 20:33, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
>>
>> dunno, my tests were based on Qt5.2 for Win32.
>> RotationAnimation on a declarative image, 15% CPU on a dual core with OpenGL.
>> rotating with QGraphicsScene / C++ ~0% CPU with or
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 20:13, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2014 19:54, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
wrote:
On 28 July 2014 20:13, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2014 19:54, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>>> wrote:
On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 19:54, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
wrote:
On 28 July 2014 19:54, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>>> wrote:
On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:54:56PM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
> > On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wro
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
wrote:
On 28 July 2014 19:29, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>>> wrote:
On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
> Just a note her
On 28 July 2014 19:22, Anton Lundin wrote:
> On 28 July, 2014 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
>
>> On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
>> > Just a note here from how we thought.
>> >
>> > The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
>> > for android and one pre-req for t
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
>> wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
Just a note here from how we thought.
The scope of this GSOC p
On 28 July 2014 19:19, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
>> On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
>>> Just a note here from how we thought.
>>>
>>> The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
>>> for android and on
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:19:47PM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov
> wrote:
> > On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
> >> Just a note here from how we thought.
> >>
> >> The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
On 28 July, 2014 - Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
> > Just a note here from how we thought.
> >
> > The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
> > for android and one pre-req for that is a usable touch friendly ui.
> >
> > The curre
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 06:03:22PM +0200, Anton Lundin wrote:
> The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
> for android and one pre-req for that is a usable touch friendly ui.
>
> The current Android port of subsurface is unusable as a ui, but it
> works as a technical
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
>> Just a note here from how we thought.
>>
>> The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
>> for android and one pre-req for that is a usable touch friendly ui.
>>
>> T
On 28 July 2014 19:03, Anton Lundin wrote:
> Just a note here from how we thought.
>
> The scope of this GSOC project is to produce a usable downloader app
> for android and one pre-req for that is a usable touch friendly ui.
>
> The current Android port of subsurface is unusable as a ui, but it
>
On 28 July, 2014 - Venkatesh Shukla wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Venkatesh Shukla <
> > venkatesh.shukla.ee...@iitbhu.ac.in> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava
> > wrote:
> > >> Don't reimplem
On 28 July 2014 18:40, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
> Well, Since we ( me and thiago ) are not using subsurface only for it
> to be a awesome diving app but also as a stress test of Qt on the
> platforms it supports, I don't like that for a few reasons that I'll
> try to explain:
>
> *if* we do a Java
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava
>>
On Jul 28, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> >> Don't reimplement things if they already work ._.
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Venkatesh Shukla <
> venkatesh.shukla.ee...@iitbhu.ac.in> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava
> wrote:
> >> Don't reimplement things if they already work ._.
> >
> > Things do work but
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Same question... Are there parts that should move into master after 4.2 is
> released.
> I know that Anton makes sure we continue to compile under Android, so this
> would be very useful...
>
> I have an OSTC3 and would like to be able to show
On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:39 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>> Don't reimplement things if they already work ._.
>
> Things do work but not without Qt. And subsurface-android would not
> have Qt dependencies. Hence, the reimplementation.
Why
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> Don't reimplement things if they already work ._.
Things do work but not without Qt. And subsurface-android would not
have Qt dependencies. Hence, the reimplementation.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
> wrote:
>> O
Same question... Are there parts that should move into master after 4.2 is
released.
I know that Anton makes sure we continue to compile under Android, so this
would be very useful...
I have an OSTC3 and would like to be able to show a POC download to a
tablet :-)
/D
On July 28, 2014 7:32:
Don't reimplement things if they already work ._.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Venkatesh Shukla
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>>
>> So I see regular updates from Gehad (HTML export) and Andrey (IOS
>> Companion), but I feel like I don’t really know where we
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> So I see regular updates from Gehad (HTML export) and Andrey (IOS Companion),
> but I feel like I don’t really know where we are regarding libdivecomputer on
> Android and dive computer configuration from Subsurface. Venkatesh and
> Josep
So I see regular updates from Gehad (HTML export) and Andrey (IOS Companion),
but I feel like I don’t really know where we are regarding libdivecomputer on
Android and dive computer configuration from Subsurface. Venkatesh and Joseph,
could you send your latest status to the mailing list, pleas
39 matches
Mail list logo
