On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:09:08PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote:
>
> nice work, Dirk, indeed.
Thanks :-)
> > But once the planned dive is written to disk and read back we are back to
> > what I describe above - ALL waypoints are treated as if they were user
> > entered.
> >
> > I have a hunch
On 20 Aug 2014, at 04:42, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Hi,
nice work, Dirk, indeed.
> But once the planned dive is written to disk and read back we are back to
> what I describe above - ALL waypoints are treated as if they were user
> entered.
>
> I have a hunch that this is sufficient for most reason
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:44:42AM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> You are making my job too easy =)
I told you that I was going to tackle this one.
And I'm learning a frightening amount about how our Qt UI works.
Kinda fun :-)
But there are lots more bugs in trac that could use someone who wants
You are making my job too easy =)
Em 19/08/2014 23:42, "Dirk Hohndel" escreveu:
> This was one of the outstanding features that we didn't get done in time
> for 4.2. And it turned out to be on the one hand not very hard, on the
> other hand fairly instrumental to finding quite a few bugs that wer
This was one of the outstanding features that we didn't get done in time
for 4.2. And it turned out to be on the one hand not very hard, on the
other hand fairly instrumental to finding quite a few bugs that were still
lurking here and there in the planner code. I think more of the commits in
this
