On 5 February 2016 06:34:51 GMT+00:00, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen
wrote:
>The edit button doesn't work:
>
>https://goo.gl/photos/MPW4PoTVpTP3xywKA
>
>Cheers,
>Henrik
I have reported this previously - if you keep trying it will eventually work
(my records since I started counting are a minimum of
The edit button doesn't work:
https://goo.gl/photos/MPW4PoTVpTP3xywKA
Cheers,
Henrik
--
Sent from my phone
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
You can connect via qml
There a Connections {} qml entity that works for that.
Em 4 de fev de 2016 13:48, "Willem Ferguson" <
willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za> escreveu:
> On 01/02/2016 20:46, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
>> I can have a class DiveComputers that is a model based on
>> QAbstractListMod
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
> > Should we be merging dives with zero depth? I do not see any real
> > reason to have the check in place, but it would not be the first time
> > I am missing something.
>
> SACRI
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
>> Should we be merging dives with zero depth? I do not see any real
>> reason to have the check in place, but it would not be the first time
>> I am missing something.
>
> SACRILEGE
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:49:27PM +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
> Should we be merging dives with zero depth? I do not see any real
> reason to have the check in place, but it would not be the first time
> I am missing something.
SACRILEGE! You are attempting to change code that was written by the
M
Should we be merging dives with zero depth? I do not see any real
reason to have the check in place, but it would not be the first time
I am missing something. Of course, it does not really make sense to
have dives with zero depth, but as the bug report is from importing,
it really makes even less
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:37:57AM +0200, Willem Ferguson wrote:
>
> At the moment, downloadmanager is in the Desktop-widgets. This is
> for development purposes only because it is handy to have
> downloadfromdivecomputer.cpp close to downloadmanager.cpp
I don't know what that means. "have [it] c
On 01/02/2016 20:46, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
I can have a class DiveComputers that is a model based on
QAbstractListModel, since any dive can have zero or more dive
computers, I can have the method DiveComputers *diveComputers() on the
class Dive as a Q_PROPERTY, and I can access it in QML via:
