Re: looking for testers with iPhones and iPads

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 10:33 PM, Robert Helling wrote: > > Dirk, > >> On 24.03.2016, at 01:03, Dirk Hohndel > > wrote: >> >> >> The "easiest" way to do beta testing for iOS apps appears to require me to >> collect device IDs from my testers. >> >> So those of you wit

Re: looking for testers with iPhones and iPads

Dirk, > On 24.03.2016, at 01:03, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > The "easiest" way to do beta testing for iOS apps appears to require me to > collect device IDs from my testers. > > So those of you with iDevices who are interested in testing my current > build... could you follow these instruction

Re: signed vs unsigned

On quarta-feira, 23 de março de 2016 09:53:04 PDT Robert Helling wrote: > Anyway, my conclusion from all this trouble in the past was to _always_ use > the signed version since this prevents the trouble. As far as I can see, > the potential cost is that the maximally representable number is only ha

looking for testers with iPhones and iPads

I clearly don't have enough pain and my todo list is too short, so let's do something about that. The "easiest" way to do beta testing for iOS apps appears to require me to collect device IDs from my testers. So those of you with iDevices who are interested in testing my current build... coul

Subsurface 4.5.4.10 -> 4.5.5

I just kicked off daily builds (4.5.4.10) for all the platforms. This includes the very latest libdivecomputer with added support for the Cochran dive computers. If nothing else comes up, I'll release this as 4.5.5 soon. /D ___ subsurface mailing list

Re: [PATCHES] 4.5.5

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Robert Helling > wrote: > b) Get rid of the maximum value properly (not by making it ridiculously big > but by also deleting it from the .ui file). In any case, wha

Re: signed vs unsigned

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Robert Helling wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 23.03.2016, at 16:15, Dirk Hohndel > > wrote: >> >> We have certain values that are unsigned because of the C standard. >> sizeof() for example. We have other values that are semantically always >> no

Re: [PATCHES] 4.5.5

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Robert Helling wrote: > b) Get rid of the maximum value properly (not by making it ridiculously > big but by also deleting it from the .ui file). In any case, what is it > good for? Why do we want to prevent the user from doing stupid things? > Because we could ge

Re: signed vs unsigned

Hi, > On 23.03.2016, at 16:15, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > We have certain values that are unsigned because of the C standard. > sizeof() for example. We have other values that are semantically always > non-negative (temperature in K, pressure in a vessel). > > The initial reason for doing all this

Re: subsurface typo fix

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 07:57:35PM +0100, Werner Macho wrote: > Hi! > > I guess it would be easier to create a pull request somewhere but I > could not find which repository is the official one to create a pull > request on. > http://git.subsurface-divelog.org/ > https://github.com/torvalds/subsur

subsurface typo fix

Hi! I guess it would be easier to create a pull request somewhere but I could not find which repository is the official one to create a pull request on. http://git.subsurface-divelog.org/ https://github.com/torvalds/subsurface I only found the explaination to create patches which can be sent by m

Re: cloud connection timeout

> On Mar 23, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> Yes, git gives us a very vague idea of how big the transfer might be, but >> that's long after the SSL connection was established. And Miika never gets >> that far because we

Re: [PATCHES] 4.5.5

Dirk,On 23.03.2016, at 15:52, Dirk Hohndel wrote:Since this was already pushed out, it has to be a second patch that fixesthings. Otherwise this would change a git repository that others havepulled from and pulls wouldn't be 'fast forward' anymore.here you go.From 06af8ecaf41dcbd

Re: cloud connection timeout

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Yes, git gives us a very vague idea of how big the transfer might be, but > that's long after the SSL connection was established. And Miika never gets > that far because we have a fairly short timeout for the SSL connection. Also, on a bad

Re: cloud connection timeout

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:22:40AM +0100, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On Dienstag, 22. März 2016 21:34:30 CET Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > So in all honesty - I'm not sure what the right answer is here. I don't > > think that a "several minutes" sync time is useful at all. That's why we > > have the local

Re: signed vs unsigned

I knew those would come back to bite me... On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:53:04AM +0100, Robert Helling wrote: > Dirk, > > you committed > > Clean up signedness confusion in planner.c > > in which you declared several ints to be unsigned. This breaks at least the > ascents in recreational mode

Re: cloud connection timeout

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:48:27PM +0800, Miika Turkia wrote: > this was a sync of 20 new dives from the desktop app to cloud. Just > wanted to get them to the android app (which synced afterwards without > problems). So to me it was useful to see this works. But I doubt I'll > attempt it again wit

Re: [PATCHES] 4.5.5

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 08:47:36AM +0100, Robert Helling wrote: > > you caught me here but your „solution“ actually makes it worse: Ha. > The problem is when switching from PSI to bar: You start, say with a value of > 580psi (roughly 40bar). Then you change units, this makes the above code > e

Re: cloud connection timeout

On Dienstag, 22. März 2016 21:34:30 CET Dirk Hohndel wrote: > So in all honesty - I'm not sure what the right answer is here. I don't > think that a "several minutes" sync time is useful at all. That's why we > have the local cache. The problem is... how do we get people to do the > first sync wher

Re: cloud connection timeout

> On 23 Mar 2016, at 12:34, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > >>> On Mar 22, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Miika Turkia wrote: >>> >>> On 22 Mar 2016, at 22:16, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Miika Turkia wrote: I am currently suffering from poor network connectivity

Re: [PATCHES] 4.5.5

> On 23.03.2016, at 00:14, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Thanks, Robert. > > I have a couple of small concerns. Given that it's past midnight in > Germany, I'll just fix them in your commit > > /D > >> diff --git a/desktop-widgets/diveplanner.cpp >> b/desktop-widgets/diveplanner.cpp >> index e6fe6