On 07/11/2017 22:50, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
i need some
decision making here:
- should we discard these at the parsing stage?
- should we discard this at the saving stage?
- should the map widget *ignore* such dive sites that are not linked
to dives and not create markers for them?
- should
Dennis Hansen has reported a bug at the google groups forum and then
reported the same issue at Github:
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/issues/786
the SSRF file he provided has some dive sites without names and no
dives are using them:
--
...snip...
...
> On Nov 6, 2017, at 10:33 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> Version numbers are FUN with this one. I'm working on that.
That part should be fixed now.
The additional tag that we keep inserting and moving on GitHub in order
to create the builds for the latest push/merge was
> On Nov 6, 2017, at 11:51 PM, Guillaume Gardet
> wrote:
>> I have now tested this and can confirm your observation :-(
>>
>> With a local build binary I get
>>
>> Requesting connect on the social network
>> subsurface.facebook: Current url call
>>