RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Rob Mason via subsurface
Yes, I can confirm that download also fails for me when BLE is used (“unrecognised operation”). “Auto” and “Classic” work fine (both from restarting the application). OSTC2 with hwOS Tech v3.10 From: Dirk Hohndel Sent: 22 June 2020 17:23 To: Jason Bramwell Cc: Paul Buxton ; Rob Mason ;

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Paul Buxton via subsurface
Thanks, sounds like there are issues to address! On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 19:50 Jason Bramwell via subsurface, < subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote: > Force LE with the same bluetooth dongle works fine on Linux Mint 19.3. I > was a bit worried by el cheapo no-name dongle might not support

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
Force LE with the same bluetooth dongle works fine on Linux Mint 19.3. I was a bit worried by el cheapo no-name dongle might not support Bluetooth LE but this proves it does. JB On 22/06/2020 18:49, Jason Bramwell wrote: These might be useful. This is a download when set to Auto, then a

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
These might be useful. This is a download when set to Auto, then a download when set to Force LE then a download when set to Force Classic. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Jason Bramwell Sent: 22 June 2020 18:35 To: Dirk Hohndel Cc: Subsurface Mailing List Subject: RE: Request for testers

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
I don’t have the same luck, Force LE gives me Putting it back to Auto for Force Classic immediately restored functionality. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Dirk Hohndel Sent: 22 June 2020 17:28 To: Jason Bramwell Cc: Subsurface Mailing List Subject: Re: Request for testers BTW, Lubomir

Re: renaming the default branch to 'main'

2020-06-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> On Jun 21, 2020, at 11:58 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > [2020-06-15 13:01:04 -0700] Dirk Hohndel via subsurface: >> I strongly believe that words matter. And that sometimes it's the small >> things where we can show respect. > > Shall we rename divemaster too? As an explicit GUI label it

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
BTW, Lubomir was able to test and responded on the GitHub PR that for him this works. So I have high hopes that this will work for you as well. If you have the time, I would REALLY appreciate a second test, though. /D > On Jun 22, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Dirk Hohndel via subsurface > wrote: > >

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
Now comes the important question. If you try the OSTCs again, but in the Download UI select the "BLE only" option, does it still work? The way to do this is to switch "Bluetooth mode" in the "Remove Bluetooth device selection" dialog to "Force LE". IIRC the OSTCs are both dual stack BT & BLE

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
Petrel has Bluetooth connectivity and it’s downloading information but it says error parsing the header for each of the dives. This has not been used for a very long time and has had firmware updated multiple times since it was last used so this is possible a red herring. OSTC Plus-Sport didn’t

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Paul Buxton via subsurface
Great, thanks both! On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:04 PM Rob Mason wrote: > Superb – thanks Paul! That last part (subsurface_test) resolves my main > concern - I would hate to risk corrupting or overwriting my dive logs! > > > > I’ll test using my OSTC2 > > > > -- > > *Rob Mason* > > 07770 578764 >

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Rob Mason via subsurface
Superb – thanks Paul! That last part (subsurface_test) resolves my main concern - I would hate to risk corrupting or overwriting my dive logs! I’ll test using my OSTC2 -- Rob Mason 07770 578764 From: Paul Buxton Sent: 22 June 2020 13:32 To: Rob Mason Cc: Jason Bramwell ; Subsurface Mailing

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
I feel like such a doofus, all it was that I wasn’t signed in to GitHub. I guess I was expecting more of a permissions denied rather than simply a 404 but I know i’ve seen that before with GitHub so should have thought about signing in, apologies. Will try and so some testing. JB Sent from

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Paul Buxton via subsurface
Thanks for the suggestion Rob. If you have a github account and have logged in then the github link will download a file called Windows-artifacts.zip. Once the file has downloaded, extract the subsurface-installer.exe by double clicking the file to open it and then drag the file

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Rob Mason via subsurface
You need to register for a GitHub account for the link to work. @paul - might be worth adding some install instructions to gain a wider group of testers? On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 11:57 Jason Bramwell via subsurface, < subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org> wrote: > Download link doesn’t work for me,

Re: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Paul Buxton via subsurface
Hmm, didn't realise the github link would be not be visible to everyone! Odd that it gives a 404 error rather than some form of permissions based message. I am not keen on this being published via a non-traceable solution (i.e. with the github one it is built from visible source via the github

RE: Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Jason Bramwell via subsurface
Download link doesn’t work for me, willing to test though. I have a Petret, OSTC Plus-Sport and OSTC Plus-Tech I can test with. Since moving to a Bluetooth connected computer I have shied away from using Subsurface on Windows and instead use Subsurface on Linux Mint because of the Bluetooth

Request for testers

2020-06-22 Thread Paul Buxton via subsurface
Hi everyone. I have been working to update the windows build to updates to Qt 5.15 as well as drop having to use carefully picked versions of some libraries, with the goal that it will be easier to keep it up to date in the future. One of the specific libraries that is impacted is the one that

Re: renaming the default branch to 'main'

2020-06-22 Thread Gaetan Bisson via subsurface
[2020-06-15 13:01:04 -0700] Dirk Hohndel via subsurface: > I strongly believe that words matter. And that sometimes it's the small > things where we can show respect. Shall we rename divemaster too? As an explicit GUI label it gets much more user exposure than the default branch name. I would